Remove this Banner Ad

Three points for a win --- Hmmm

  • Thread starter Thread starter X_box_X
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by Diego Forlan
Considering cheating and plagaraism by undergraduates and postgraduates is at disturbingly high levels, people with degrees may not necessarily have any knowledge of the subject matter.

I find this ironic, considering when someone presses you with a question you can't answer, this is your first tactic, sweetie pie.

and Diego Forlan becomes the latest inductee of the Spank Dan Hall of Fame.

Congratulations Diego :eek:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Diego Forlan
Your dumped, where's that massive man Moomba? Maybe our new found love will be reciprocated amongst all City and United fans ;) ;)

People who like cats shouldn't be together with people who like dogs.
People who eat meat shouldn't be together with people who are vegans.
And people who barrack for UNITED should not be with people who barrack for the massives (or Liverpool or Leeds).
 
Originally posted by Shinboners
People who like cats shouldn't be together with people who like dogs.
People who eat meat shouldn't be together with people who are vegans.
And people who barrack for UNITED should not be with people who barrack for the massives (or Liverpool or Leeds).

Now you're just jealous cos I've found true love with a massive.. and he's massive in all the right places.

Sure, there is a less than 1% chance of this occuring. You can't argue with maths can you? ;)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Jars458
Fair bit of Dan bashing going on here which I usaully have no problem with.

However in my opinion it was quite clear that Dan's reference to Shinners and Diego sleeping together was in fact only meant to imply that they agree an awful lot.

Can't really see Dan was saying they were actually gay or that he considers such to be a huge insult.

Just my opinion.

As I said, the word gay was never used. I've always thought that the long blonde locks, of Diego Forlan belonged to a woman. Live and learn I suppose.
 
Originally posted by Dan26
As I said, the word gay was never used. I've always thought that the long blonde locks, of Diego Forlan belonged to a woman. Live and learn I suppose.

Do we need to do a search on every time you have referred to Diego as he or him, or can we just take it as given that you are prepared to peddle any lie to try and win an internet argument.

By the way, the bum chum term you used a few pages back isn't normally used in reference to heterosexual relationships. Hypocrite and liar, what a combo.

Moomba
 
Originally posted by Dave
No, you've said things about *me*. There's nothing more personal than that.

I've never said anything about you. I don't get personal. I might get frustrated with your backward-thinking stupidity and call you names (are we not allowed to call each other names?), but I never criticize your physical personal characteristics, family, job etc - that's just no-go territory.

Direct personal abuse at me has been far worse than any I have dished out.

I've never posted anything more distatsteful than what I posted towards Dipper, and for that I apologised. But even that was only name calling - nothing to do with his personal life.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by moomba
Do we need to do a search on every time you have referred to Diego as he or him, or can we just take it as given that you are prepared to peddle any lie to try and win an internet argument.

Let me get this straight? You actually think I believe Diego Forlan is female? How old are you, 11?

Originally posted by moomba
By the way, the bum chum term you used a few pages back isn't normally used in reference to heterosexual relationships.

Who cares?
 
Originally posted by Dan26
Let me get this straight? You actually think I believe Diego Forlan is female?

No I don't, despite your two posts in the last 24 hours saying that was your belief. I still believe that the biggest insult in your immature, pathetic little mind is to infer someone is gay.

How old are you, 11?

That's a bit personal. I thought that was against your long standing policy.

Posters sexual preferences excepted

Who cares?

Obviously you do, why bother replying otherwise.

Moomba
 
Originally posted by moomba
No I don't, despite your two posts in the last 24 hours saying that was your belief. I still believe that the biggest insult in your immature, pathetic little mind is to infer someone is gay.

Is this now your little obsession? Can't find faults so you pick on the pedantic? Jars summed it up. I'm only having a go at the two of them. They were agreeing with each other to a ridiculous extent. Calling them bum-chums implies that they follow each other on the net. It does not imply they were gay unless you're sense of perspective is warped. You really don't understand context, do you?

Hey maybe if I tell you that you eat sh*t, it really means that you devour faeces? :rolleyes: You'd probably take it that literally.

Originally posted by moomba
That's a bit personal. I thought that was against your long standing policy.

If you think that's personal, you better hold onto your hat because there are people around bigfooty who will give you far worse.

Originally posted by moomba
Obviously you do, why bother replying otherwise.

Obviously you do, why bother replying otherwise. You really are struggling arent you, moomba. Not showing much of an ability to put things in their proper context. If you take everything literally, you will misunderstand a lot of what is said in the written world.
 
If the objective is solely to make sure teams are playing for a win, then there's only one possible way to make sure it happens.

WIN 3 POINTS (OR 4 OR 5, IT DOESN'T MATTER)
DRAW 0 POINTS
LOSS 0 POINTS

I guarantee you NOONE would be playing for a draw!
 
Originally posted by Dan26
Is this now your little obsession? Can't find faults so you pick on the pedantic? Jars summed it up. I'm only having a go at the two of them. They were agreeing with each other to a ridiculous extent. Calling them bum-chums implies that they follow each other on the net. It does not imply they were gay unless you're sense of perspective is warped. You really don't understand context, do you?

Well gee Dan26, you ask three questions of me in your last post, and all of a sudden I am obsessed when I reply. As for your bum-chums jibe, I know exactly what you meant, and I have a fairly good idea of your character. You call the names, then you argue that you meant that Diego was a woman, then you argue that you "really" meant that they just agreed with each other. You have shown to be full of sh1t on pretty much every occasion that I have come across you and quite frankly I wouldn't believe a word that comes out of your keyboard. As for not finding faults, I have callouses on my fingers from exposing every lie you've told, every hypocritical statement you have made, every irrelevent statistic you have put forward, and every insult you have made in this thread to avoid answering questions put to you.

Hey maybe if I tell you that you eat sh*t, it really means that you devour faeces? :rolleyes: You'd probably take it that literally.

Maybe if I tell you that you are a cretin it means that I think you are a cretin.,mmm I can see that one working.

If you think that's personal, you better hold onto your hat because there are people around bigfooty who will give you far worse.

Doesn't bother me at all, just like the hypocrisy of someone complaining about personal questions, who has made a living off personal questions to others. I am just waiting for you to make a complaint about people using rolleyes in their posts next.

Obviously you do, why bother replying otherwise. You really are struggling arent you, moomba. Not showing much of an ability to put things in their proper context. If you take everything literally, you will misunderstand a lot of what is said in the written world.

I didn't write "who cares", you did. I go onto a discussion board, I don't really see the point in refusing to get involved in topical discussion and at the moment "Dan26 is a tw@t" is the most topical on these boards.

Moomba
 
Originally posted by Dan26
I've never said anything about you. I don't get personal.

I suppose in some universe "idiot" "moron" "liar" and "bum chum" aren't considered personal abuse.

On more than one occasion you've questioned my education when we've been "discussing" an issue on the boards.

I consider that personal.

Sauce for the goose and all that :D


And you still haven't answered

a) how showing you can apply your education and therefore prove you understood what was taught isn't relevant

b) the questions about the italian league posed on bigsoccer (where they "know their stuff")

now where's that tumbleweed.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom