- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Posts
- 8,164
- Reaction score
- 14,184
- Location
- The Void
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Tasmania Devils
2 taggers, nah it's too negative. I'd hate to see that. Yove got to remember that AJ is a pure shut down player, he doesn't hurt his opponent the other way, we would be losing too much from the midfield. Also I think AJ is not a good option for defence, he could do the job on short people like hooper but again he won't provide drive from the back pocket. On last years form I wouldn't have AJ in the 22 with a full squad to choose from and with Armfield as chief tagger.
100% agree with every aspect of this post ^
Why does a tagger have to be exclusively negative? The fact is that they don't, and most aren't. There are a number of taggers that are great at stopping their man, and are equally good at finding and using the ball. In fact, most of the best taggers in the game do both the offensive and the defensive stuff.
Which is exactly why I would start Army in the 22 at the expense of AJ.



)