Remove this Banner Ad

Computers & Internet Tinder

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Comes down to math:

A - spend 2 seconds looking at each picture, swipe right 75% of the time, expect females to swipe right 20% of the time for you. spend 1 minute viewing profile to decide further. For 100 profiles that's 200 seconds swiping. You'll match on average 15 of those profiles (75% of 20) so that's 15 minutes viewing profiles. Just under 20 minutes. You'll probably discard half of those matches.

B - spend 30 seconds looking at each profile, swipe right 20% of the time, expect females to swipe right 20% of the time for you. You then spend another 30 seconds viewing their profile to decide further. So for 100 profiles you've already spent 50 minutes swiping, and on average you'll match 4 of those profiles (20% of 20).. Just over 50 minutes.

You'll have the same matches in A as you would have in B. You can always unmatch someone but once one of you swipe left then it's over.

Haha I'm usually all about your posts Passenger but I think you've overcooked it a little here, way too much maths going on for a dating app.

Plus I'm not sure being a little more choosy with your initial swipes correlates to more time wasted... I spend a max of 3 secs per bird but just don't swipe right to obvious no's. IMO makes little sense in going hell for leather right with only a limited amount of swipes per day.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Haha I'm usually all about your posts Passenger but I think you've overcooked it a little here, way too much maths going on for a dating app.
To be fair I've never sat down and put it into actual numbers like that before. But back when I was using it for a short time I could see the theory behind just swiping right instantly at anything that was "possible" or above and dealing with it later if you matched.

The like limit (is that still a thing?) blew it out the water though.
 
I don't know if I like this line of questioning :p

Had to google that Flowers fellow, but I'd say a bit more rugged than the 2 of them.

Ok, so more like Darren Lehman; got it!

And Flowers is a beautiful, beautiful man.
 
Anyone else getting reamed by tinder? I used to get a modest 20 or so matches a week but in the last few weeks I've been lucky to get one non-bot a week. I think the Jews are punishing me for not paying
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Anyone else getting reamed by tinder? I used to get a modest 20 or so matches a week but in the last few weeks I've been lucky to get one non-bot a week. I think the Jews are punishing me for not paying
I got 5 in my first 10 swipes last night. On average I'd probably get about 1 or 2 a day.

Also if anyone wants to not pay the app but change location, get the fake GPS app. Always good to mix things up and set it to the city or down the peninsula.
 
I use the swipe all and ask questions later theory.
Problem is im still getting bugger all matches and when i do they are bots or unattractive women.
I'll be getting off the tinder bandwagon soon
 
I haven't even been matched by bots so far. Even the computers don't rate me :o
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I matched with a 37yr old (which turned out to be 40, typical woman) polyamorous woman. Has a husband and a younger bf that lives down the other end of the state. Needs to fill the gap apparently. I'm 22 btw.
 
I matched with a 37yr old (which turned out to be 40, typical woman) polyamorous woman. Has a husband and a younger bf that lives down the other end of the state. Needs to fill the gap apparently. I'm 22 btw.
hehe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom