- Joined
- Sep 16, 2005
- Posts
- 21,134
- Likes
- 13,251
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- GO YOU CROW BOYS
So I've been pondering what it means for $kurt to have accepted a conditional contract with Sydney.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/149269/default.aspx
Does this mean he can't actually back away from that and agree to trades to other clubs?
Is that why he won't look at discussing other trades? Does it violate that in-principle agreement with Sydney?
Clever ****** that Blucher if this is the case.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - I'm really concerned we did ourselves in back in 2009. If Blucher was playing games with us then coz $kurt was so keen to go home - ******* send him home at the end of 2010. You still had that 1 year (top 4 year right Craigy??
) to make a run at the premiership.
I've seen some feedback on emails some other posters have shared with Harps and he indicated Triggy doesn't need to be here for this trade as he was involved in the 2009 one...
I think you can guess where my thoughts are leading on that...
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/149269/default.aspx
Does this mean he can't actually back away from that and agree to trades to other clubs?
Is that why he won't look at discussing other trades? Does it violate that in-principle agreement with Sydney?
Clever ****** that Blucher if this is the case.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - I'm really concerned we did ourselves in back in 2009. If Blucher was playing games with us then coz $kurt was so keen to go home - ******* send him home at the end of 2010. You still had that 1 year (top 4 year right Craigy??
I've seen some feedback on emails some other posters have shared with Harps and he indicated Triggy doesn't need to be here for this trade as he was involved in the 2009 one...
I think you can guess where my thoughts are leading on that...

