What are those rules though PJ? The rules will be whatever the Commission decides the rules will be.
They have to comply with overriding principles of procedural fairness and natural justice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

What are those rules though PJ? The rules will be whatever the Commission decides the rules will be.
Assuming Kurt Tippett is guilty, you would be right, they will bully him. They won't want him challenging them in court. However, I'm not 100% convinced he is entirely guilty but feel the AFL will be very friendly towards him. However, if he is found to be guilty and he does take them to court; the AFL will apply plenty of pressure.
The club and manager should have known better not to take this path and Kurt Tippett's manager should have done a much better job at explaining the legal clauses and ground to his client. So Kurt Tippett should get of scott free but the AFL like most other professional sports isn't a real world environment.
But overall, I have no idea what will happen. I doubt the Adelaide Crows will gain anything out of this but a whole lot of pain and somewhere deep down can see Kurt Tippett ending up in Sydney.
That's not really fair but it's the reality of the AFL. Heck, even Ben Cousins wasn't dealt with that harshly. It's a very player friendly league.

Bugger! Why can't I watch this on TV
So what you are saying is the guy is a prick? Yeah wish I had him representing my Club.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Crows will get off. Slap on the wrist/warning. The media have raised the spinnaker and really run with this.
But what else are they gonna do? Controversy, gossip, innuendo.
This is paradise for the likes of Caro and Rucci.
I must say, I've had great fun teasing all my crow buddies about this,
but it's gonna amount to nothing.
Not being "entirely guilty" - is that like being "a little bit pregnant"?![]()
So what you are saying is the guy is a prick? Yeah wish I had him representing my Club.
As I think back I'm reminded of a case many years ago when Eddo was making his way. Public sector admin hearing in a makeshift hearing room. It was a 40 degree day. The makeshift hearing area was air conditioned however the only waiting area for witnesses was outside. Eddo was defending. There were 3 prosecution witnesses in suits who gave their evidence and Eddo knew he did not want to cross examine any of them. However he indicated that he might need to and refused to allow their release. Those 3 were then made to wait in the heat for 2 hours until it became a health issue and he finally relented and said he would not need them. He just kinda goes that extra step if you get my drift.
I agree, wish it was on TV!!!!
You would neve be a lawyer (or a politician) as you have a consciencePersonally I feel a bit dirty knowing that the AFC has employed the same person Eugene McGee. I know laywers are just doing their job, and he obviously does his very well. However, if I was a laywer I don't know if my conscience would have let me represent someone who (to me at least) was guilty and trying to get out of killing someone via legal technicalities.
... but I get what you mean as McGee should have got jail time.It's really interesting to see that the two sides have adopted opposite strategies.
Tippett camp: making their case in the media, mouthing vague threats of further legal action, trying to intimidate the AFL by suggesting they may not accept 'the verdict' and could take it to court.
AFC: openly stated they will accept the AFL's verdict.
Which will prove to be the best strategy?
(I think the AFL will be intimidated by Tippett's approach and go light on him, and throw the book at us.....because they can. Hope I am wrong.)
On a football field perhaps - but not in the general pursuit of life. I still think he's a prick. I was involved in the McGee case and have hated everyone who acted on his behalf in any form ever since. Probably why my ears pricked up when I heard his name mentioned. When you are guilty he seems like the man to turn to though so I think the AFC got this one right. On this form I'm surprised they didn't enlist Michael Abbott as well...Easy for you to say as its does not affect you. If you were in trouble Im sure you would want someone going the extra metre. Im surprised you would question this given the way your club used to play its football.
Ahhh, Muppets, so THAT'S what she calls them....Because the stations are too busy developing quality shows for muppets like this
![]()

Peter J, please stop with the teasing! You are exciting me, giving me hope that we actually have some decent chance of getting of lightly! This lawyer sounds impressive. At least I can feel comforted in knowing we tried our best, getting the best defence lawyer we could.

Monday and this saga...with hopefully....be over. PO Kurt Tippett.

Sorry much as would love it to be but will not be over monday I am afraid.Monday and this saga...with hopefully....be over. PO Kurt Tippett.
Personally I feel a bit dirty knowing that the AFC has employed the same person Eugene McGee. I know laywers are just doing their job, and he obviously does his very well. However, if I was a laywer I don't know if my conscience would have let me represent someone who (to me at least) was guilty and trying to get out of killing someone via legal technicalities.
Id buy a hooker not a lawyer.Don't you hire the best person to get you off?
But what I really hate is the AFL with them everything is cool until the media blows it up and then they bring out the big stick. Way too much underhanded crap from them helping the expansion teams at the cost of clubs that made the competition what it is today.

Because the stations are too busy developing quality shows for muppets like this
![]()