There were some odd remarks in that article. I don't think I have seen anything in the media that has been overtly critical of Blucher. Most of the vitriol has been focused on the Crows, and only more recently on Tippett and the AFL for making a meal of things.just adding to this, this is what was said on Blucher:
Blucher has worn hit after hit and in recent weeks and those close to him have been concerned for his health. Poor baby. I'm sure Tippett, Trigg, Harper and the AFC aren't feeling all that hot either.
Blucher will argue he was not aware that he could agree to Adelaide's offer to trade Tippett to the club of his choice and for a set trade.
This makes NO sense what so ever. WTF?
WTF is right. Taking it at face value, does that mean no offer was agreed on? Think it it must be a case of poor editing.








