Yep, like others have said here, make him captain of the 2s and a development role off field.
List Mgmt. Tom Lynch - Looking at Melbourne
- Thread starter bigblackboz
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Yep, like others have said here, make him captain of the 2s and a development role off field.
Next to sign?You can write off that source as a bust I'm afraid
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 77,385
- 152,108
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #228
Already signed
1 more year? Any news on matt crouch, grigg and cey?
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 77,385
- 152,108
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #230
Yeah one year. Nothing I've heard re those other guys.
Madrooster1964
Draftee
- Aug 10, 2015
- 9
- 77
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- North Adelaide
Not suggesting that it is negotiations have stalled, but both Lynch and Matt Crouch are playing hardball and might take a little longer yet.
I would think Lyons or CEY would be looking for a guaranteed starting 22 spot and if they won't get it at the crows, then they would go.
Really, it's probably a win-win situation anyway.
- Jul 19, 2010
- 25,598
- 63,282
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Gutsy POV.
I was thinking about this the other day. We've had a recent spate of club greats who went on just one year too long.
What was it Ian Chappell said to Shane Warne when he retired? Something like, it's better that people ask why did he than why didn't he.
You wanna leave the party while you're still having fun. (That one's mine, not Chappell's.)
We don't need a key defender anymore than we need a hard running lead up high half fwd and someone who creates goals
Give him 3 yrs
I'm guessing they are hoping McGovern may pressure his spot in 2 yrs time once his durabilityand fitness improves but give lynch 3
Ok so I posted it in jest before, but lets me put this out there and ask a simple question:
Trade
Crows: Out Dangerfield, Lynch, 2nd round pick In: Hogan, Pick 5, Melb 2nd round pick
Melbourne : Out Hogan, Pick 5, 2nd round pick In: Dangerfield, Lynch, Crows 2nd round pick
Who says no?
Trade
Crows: Out Dangerfield, Lynch, 2nd round pick In: Hogan, Pick 5, Melb 2nd round pick
Melbourne : Out Hogan, Pick 5, 2nd round pick In: Dangerfield, Lynch, Crows 2nd round pick
Who says no?
- Oct 28, 2014
- 9,860
- 23,943
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Melbourne.
Big Gazoongas
Cancelled
Ah NO!!
I tend to agree, but if Dangerfield said he wants to leave?? If Melbourne offered him a massive contract? Pretty good return really and tempting.
Silly hypothetical, but if it was done, I'd be ok with it.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Norm Smith Medallist
- Oct 26, 2012
- 8,528
- 12,477
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I wouldn't do that trade and I doubt Melbourne would want to either.
Also, why would Danger agree to go to Melbourne if he wants success?
To be fair, it is often said that the sign of a good trade is that both sets of supporters are left unhappy.
But Melbourne would never go for it, so it's a moot point.
But Melbourne would never go for it, so it's a moot point.
- Jun 10, 2009
- 29,795
- 44,888
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels Beaufort Crows
And you know this??
How??
Interesting from a 1st time poster that follows North Melbourne...
Big Gazoongas
Cancelled
Madrooster1964
Draftee
- Aug 10, 2015
- 9
- 77
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- North Adelaide
Have supported North Melb all my life (passionate about North Adelaide to went for any team beginning in North) - sadly I'm old enough that began before the Crows existed. Comes from the son of a Senior Crows staffer - and as much as I ask - neither know anything about Dangerfield.
Wilko91
Senior List
OK I agree that KPF's dont get the ball unless the midfield win the ball first but a midfield will not always win the ball hence you need a decent defence to prevent forwards getting an easy shot on goal. Plus from your argument above we should get better contested ball winners before outside mids... If you arent winning the ball in the contest there is no point in having outside mids, just good rebounding defenders...
Picture our premiership team. Do you really think that Hartigan is a premiership defender?
Wouldnt it be better to utilise Lever's agility like Taylor in the Geelong like defence of Taylor, Scarlett and Lonergan?
If he was offered half ownership of all of Thredbo and Perisher?? (Melbourne supporters - ski season. It's a joke folks)
I don't know, but it looks like one of those trades that both clubs are happy with what they get and disappointed with what they lose.
I agree it is highly unlikely Danger would have any interest in Melbourne at all. Would take a truck load of cash.
ameen_ssnp
Cancelled
- Jul 5, 2015
- 225
- 627
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Yes, Of course Lynch is better but if he wants to leave, we should try Sign Watts
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Norm Smith Medallist
- Oct 26, 2012
- 8,528
- 12,477
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I was all for us getting Tambling, but I don't think Watts is going to add anything to our team.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,477
- 82,044
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
IMO, Lynch will stay.
But if he did leave, we take the draft pick(s) from Melbourne, as Watts wont add to our side.
Similar threads
