Remove this Banner Ad

Strategy Trade and List Management Thread Part 7 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Confused Curb Your Enthusiasm GIF

Wants to leave for more Midfield time. He won't get that here.
Perfect Larry David expression for this suggestion
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Flanders has requested a trade.

Not a priority but I wouldn’t mind him at half back.

If he wants more mid minutes I wouldn’t want us to go for him, don’t rate him highly in the middle

I didn't love him at half back. Just big number accumulation for not much impact. I think he's like Sheezel a bit, good ball user but not quick or a ball carrier and not a penetrating kick. He's very safe which is good if you have a bunch of butchers out of defense but they get a lot more from Rioli and Noble who have that line breaking ability. If I had Flanders I would prefer using Their foot skills further up the ground

I thought his best football in 2024 was as a midfielder. I understand why he was behind a few at Gold Coast but I don't understand why he couldn't have at least been a 30-40% CBA a game player. It was either 80% or more frequently 0%
 
If Merrett was obtainable and open to a trade to us I would pursue it.

Outside the box I would put Bont behind the ball and have Merrett, Richards, Libba, Treloar, Freijah and Kennedy as the inside nucleus.

This is if no first choice key defenders are available.
 
If Merrett was obtainable and open to a trade to us I would pursue it.

Outside the box I would put Bont behind the ball and have Merrett, Richards, Libba, Treloar, Freijah and Kennedy as the inside nucleus.

This is if no first choice key defenders are available.
Why would you take out our best midfielder for an inferior player to accommodate an inferior player?
 
Why would you take out our best midfielder for an inferior player to accommodate an inferior player?
Need to explore all options to improve this shaky defence.

Wilkie and Butts would be 100% best case scenario but history dictates we just don’t get the big names through the door.

I think Bont could Marshall a pretty strong defensive unit and you could replace him with someone like Butters (preference) or Merrett.

We cannot enter this off-season with the same defensive unit and a couple of fringe options added. Won’t get the job done.

Some pretty ballsy trade moves are required.

Pretty mute point anyway cause we won’t get either Butters nor Merrett.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Need to explore all options to improve this shaky defence.

Wilkie and Butts would be 100% best case scenario but history dictates we just don’t get the big names through the door.

I think Bont could Marshall a pretty strong defensive unit and you could replace him with someone like Butters (preference) or Merrett.

We cannot enter this off-season with the same defensive unit and a couple of fringe options added. Won’t get the job done.

Some pretty ballsy trade moves are required.

Pretty mute point anyway cause we won’t get either Butters nor Merrett.
Good chance of Butters just not this offseason
 
Need to explore all options to improve this shaky defence.

Wilkie and Butts would be 100% best case scenario but history dictates we just don’t get the big names through the door.

I think Bont could Marshall a pretty strong defensive unit and you could replace him with someone like Butters (preference) or Merrett.

We cannot enter this off-season with the same defensive unit and a couple of fringe options added. Won’t get the job done.

Some pretty ballsy trade moves are required.

Pretty moot point anyway cause we won’t get either Butters nor Merrett.
Animated GIF
 
Need to explore all options to improve this shaky defence.

Wilkie and Butts would be 100% best case scenario but history dictates we just don’t get the big names through the door.

I think Bont could Marshall a pretty strong defensive unit and you could replace him with someone like Butters (preference) or Merrett.

We cannot enter this off-season with the same defensive unit and a couple of fringe options added. Won’t get the job done.

Some pretty ballsy trade moves are required.

Pretty mute point anyway cause we won’t get either Butters nor Merrett.
Bont would IMO be more valuable in defence and I think it's time we try something new. Would love Butts as well but seems iffy right now. Bont going back strengthens our backline and opens up an on ball spot too. Feel like it is the big move Bevo needs to experiment with.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Well the past 5 years of him being the best on baller have led to nothing so why not the next 5 years in defence spoiling the ball out of bounds, intercept marking and using his elite kicking to launch counter attacks? I think it is worth a shot to at least look at.
You don’t address your defensive deficiencies by taking the best midfielder in the clubs history and plonking him in the backline. You recruit competent defenders which, evidently, is exactly what we’re currently trying to do.
 
You don’t address your defensive deficiencies by taking the best midfielder in the clubs history and plonking him in the backline. You recruit competent defenders which, evidently, is exactly what we’re currently trying to do.
There is a chance that comes to nothing and we also lose Buku and Jones. Would be even weaker than this year.
 
Well the past 5 years of him being the best on baller have led to nothing so why not the next 5 years in defence spoiling the ball out of bounds, intercept marking and using his elite kicking to launch counter attacks? I think it is worth a shot to at least look at.
yes Bont on ball was the issue

Why didn’t we try Vandermeer in the ruck or Libba as a forward pocket
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top