hird is a champ said:Also maybe Mark Mcveigh to Sydney for either Okeefe or Saddington?
Hell no. McVeigh is very much required.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
hird is a champ said:Also maybe Mark Mcveigh to Sydney for either Okeefe or Saddington?
Darealrath said:Hell no. McVeigh is very much required.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
bomber0018 said:Overrated, wouldn't be worth it. I don't 'rate' (for want of a better term) him at all.
Bolton for Salopek ... would like to see Porthos' reaction to this proposal.hird is a champ said:Sheedy wants to buslter up ythe midfield so it suggested in the paper we should trade for crawford. Personally we should use mark Johnson and sumthing esle (Henneman) for travis johnstone. And maybe shop around bolton to port for salopek.
Why would you swap McVeigh for Saddington, who is just a poorer version of Mark Bolton?hird is a champ said:Also maybe Mark Mcveigh to Sydney for either Okeefe or Saddington?
hird is a champ said:We have enough players in his calibre
Pevers-Legend said:Could you imagine McLeod passing the ball to Lloyd all year. 120-130+ goals he would be looking at. McLeod has some of the best foot skills I have ever seen.
Darealrath said:Hell no. McVeigh is very much required.
Kane McGoodwin said:Bolton for Salopek ... would like to see Porthos' reaction to this proposal.
What would you guys offer for Andrew McLeod? ... & don't suggest duds like Heneman.
Disco Clarky said:He is very much required but would you say no to Mcveigh for Okeefe??
Id take Okeefe
Darealrath said:I rate O'Keefe but i think we need a player like McVeigh more than we need a half forward flanker.
Yeah, I would probably swap Macca for MJ + 1st rounder. We need some more harder type players in our team. I reckon Macca would be well suited to the Dons setup, as it will give you a classy finisher type midfielder to feed your forwards. Can't see AFC trading Macca though. Rumour was that Sheedy is more interested in Tyson Edwards.Disco Clarky said:For Mcleod I reckon wed offer the following.. Mark Jhonson + 1st round pick
or Jhonson + Bolton What do you think is this fair?? perhaps not.
Disco Clarky said:Dunno , apart from Lloyd this year we have really struggled for a small goalkicker and when Lloyd or Lucas aren't kicking goals we really tend to struggle on the scoreboard. Dont get me wrong I love Mcveigh and think he will continue to improve dont want to trade him its just that i rate Okeefe very very highly.
marcuz said:He is a very good footballer. He would add some class to a very much grunt orientated midfield. Too much blue collar and not enough silk through our on- ball division.
Depending on how much melbourne would want for him i think he would be worth it. Its time for our football department to stop talking and take some action on the midfield issue.
Disco Clarky said:He is very much required but would you say no to Mcveigh for Okeefe??
Id take Okeefe
anduril said:Hmmmm...well you could always do a package trade....ship the ol drunk Sheeds off to Melbourne for Johnstone and Daniher.N.![]()