Sydney are compensated for their higher cost of living.campbell said:Errrr, what about Sydneys cap......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Sydney are compensated for their higher cost of living.campbell said:Errrr, what about Sydneys cap......
bucksisbest said:Sydney are compensated for their higher cost of living.
good point.Total Package said:So are Melbourne clubs not compensated for a higher cost of living there than Adelaide and Perth?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
There's no doubting you've got a point there , but as I understand it the standard salary cap doesn't ensure the ability to be able to buy a house and car of the same standard that the Melbourne based players can afford(ofcourse you can now argue that Adelaide and Perth players can buy oneof an even higher standard).Total Package said:So are Melbourne clubs not compensated for a higher cost of living there than Adelaide and Perth?
Ari said:LOL. Essendon lost 3 of its players in 2000 due to the cap. Caracella even went to Brissy, I guess they had more dough in the bag than us.
Zombie said:How is that Brisbane's fault? Essendon had salary cap problems because they had one good season and all of a sudden all of the players started to believe the smoke that the media were blowing up their arses. So all of these overrated average players started demanding more money and had to move elsewhere to fit their big heads in.
History tells us that the Essendon 2000 team weren't that great (not a dynasty type team) and these players who were so talented went on to do SFA or at best be the average players they always were at their new clubs.
The difference between Essendon and Brisbane is that Brisbane players put the team first, take away their $600k that no-one cared about until they started winning premierships, do you really think that would make any difference? Of course it wouldn't because the Lions are a champion team and their best players would just take a pay cut in order to keep their team together.
Don't give me this, "Essendon lost 3 players due to the cap" rubbish, they lost those players because they were greedy.
Alpha Wolf said:Shhh, you're making sense and that's not allowed on this board.
Don't you love how poor old hard done by Essendon is always brought up as a rule in these discussions? I wonder why? Anyone care to bring up any other premiership team that has had trouble keeping the team intact? Isn't Essendon the exception, rather than the rule? Doesn't anyone think that maybe Essendon simply Fu(ked up?
It's hilarious how many of these threads pop up when the Lions are doing well. That there are so many floating around at the moment can only mean one thing: Another Lions premiership is imminent.
I read somewhere that Essendon is paying two players - Mercuri and Hird - around 1.7 million $$$s. Ya'think maybe this has something to do with their salary cap problems??? Don't think Lions are paying any two of their players that much. So did Caracella go to Brisbane because Lions have more money to spend or because Essendon was stupid? This is why I get sick of Bomber fans bemoaning Lions having more money to spend!Zombie said:How is that Brisbane's fault? Essendon had salary cap problems because they had one good season and all of a sudden all of the players started to believe the smoke that the media were blowing up their arses. So all of these overrated average players started demanding more money and had to move elsewhere to fit their big heads in.
History tells us that the Essendon 2000 team weren't that great (not a dynasty type team) and these players who were so talented went on to do SFA or at best be the average players they always were at their new clubs.
The difference between Essendon and Brisbane is that Brisbane players put the team first, take away their $600k that no-one cared about until they started winning premierships, do you really think that would make any difference? Of course it wouldn't because the Lions are a champion team and their best players would just take a pay cut in order to keep their team together.
Don't give me this, "Essendon lost 3 players due to the cap" rubbish, they lost those players because they were greedy.
You read wrong. Believing the media is a fools paradise, a naive trick at best.LoneStar said:I read somewhere that Essendon is paying two players - Mercuri and Hird - around 1.7 million $$$s.
above.Ya'think maybe this has something to do with their salary cap problems??? Don't think Lions are paying any two of their players that much.
I agree completely that Brisbanes players are taking about 90% of what they could receive elsewhere.... and this has an impact on their success. But that said, yes the extra 600k does make a difference. It's worth 3 A grade players. Now you cant have them all on the field at the same time, but it gives them 'depth'. All clubs will have, on average, 2 or 3 good players out at any time. You could say this of Brisbane, but they have something quality to stick in the gap. Yes, a lot of it does come down to their fantastic player management, so I wont knock them that.So did Caracella go to Brisbane because Lions have more money to spend or because Essendon was stupid?
.... umm, but they do. I tell you what, we could use an Extra 600 odd down at Bomberland! I dont wanna sound like a whinge though... so ill leave it there!This is why I get sick of Bomber fans bemoaning Lions having more money to spend!
skilts said:You seem to have missed the import of what I wrote. I'm notorious for assuming understanding.
In fact, what I was referring to was that this Brisbane Lions team plays better football TO WATCH, than any team I've ever seen. That is not to say that they have appeared on top of the H&A ladder for the past several years, more that they are the best providers of entertainment to which our competition has aspired.
moomba said:However the ruling has to be fair, and across the board. Melbourne based clubs face similar (not as big) problems retaining out ot town players, and I don't feel that this is recognised by the current rules.
Roylion said:All clubs also have access to the extra 5% if their local content falls below 40%.
Total Package said:Yes how convenient of the AFL to make the figure 40%...
skilts said:You and all of you fellow-travellers have my utmost sympathy to be put-upon to watch the greatest team there's ever been.
What would you rather be doing?
Is there a team you'd rather be watching?
QUOTE]
Sydney![]()
RIPPER_46 said:Port & the West Coast Victorians must be going close.
Exactly, you are just as disadvantaged in that respect, so are Victorian clubs with players from other states, so whats the difference.... we aren't competing with rugby.... would just like a modicum of honesty from the AFL.... and preferebly some from Brisbane supporters, instead of the excuses they come up with to explain sanctioned cheating.Total Package said:Adkins, Braun, Butler, Chambers, Hansen, Humm, Johnson, Judd, McConnell, Morrison, Munro, Selwood, Staker, Waters, Wirrpunda, Wooden.
16 of 41 are from interstate... thats 39.02% of our list. Maybe we should delist a WA player and recruit another VIC and then get our slice of the Brisbane/Sydney corruption pie as well.
Gunder said:It's premiership by default and compromises the competition, and worse.... it is just plain boring
theferrett said:Total Package, get your lonely head out of your lonely arse and get out and play a game, watch a game, listen to what the commentators are saying.
Brisbane, if they pull it of will the greatest, there will just be the odd tosser like yourself who will grandstand and probably have more admiration for your bitchy postings than the real thing.
Total Package said:Yes how convenient of the AFL to make the figure 40%... knowing that it will more than likely only ever be relevant for Brisbane and Sydney.
Total Package said:Adkins, Braun, Butler, Chambers, Hansen, Humm, Johnson, Judd, McConnell, Morrison, Munro, Selwood, Staker, Waters, Wirrpunda, Wooden.
16 of 41 are from interstate... thats 39.02% of our list. Maybe we should delist a WA player and recruit another VIC and then get our slice of the Brisbane/Sydney corruption pie as well.