Votes vs Swans - are there any?

[Cat_flying_high]

Not having known of this site a year ago I don't know if you guys normally do votes in the finals, but we may as well I guess.

5 Judd - he did contribute half of our goals
4 Wirrpunda
3 Fletcher
2 Glass
1 Hunter

It's really hard for a player to play well when a significant amount of the rest of the team isn't playing well. It's a bit unfair I guess, in other games we've had heaps of people who deserve votes - some people who i didn't give votes to in the past because heaps of people deserved them in that particular game, played better than all these people put together.

Oh well... here's to a good 2005

 

[daddy_4_eyes]

5: Wirrpunda
4: Glass
3: Hunter
2: Judd
1: Fletcher

 

[West Coast Fan 123]

5. Wirrapunda
4. Cox
3. Hunter
2. Judd
1. Banfield

 

[The Passenger]

5 - Judd
4 - Cox
3 - Wirrpunda
2 - Fletcher
1 - Glass

 

[Mead]

5. Judd
4. Hunter
3. Wirrpunda
2. Cox
1. Glass

 

[Voice of Reason]

5. Judd
4. Cox
3. Wirrpunda
2. Hunter
1. Banfield

Morrison, Glass & Chick did OK too.

 

[West Coast Fan 123]

Morrison, Glass & Chick did OK too.

I thought it was good of Woosha to stick with Chick on Oloughlin. You could see that Chicky thought he had somehting to prove and put in a gallant effort but must have lost some confidence after that terrible free kick.

 

[Clayton]

5. Wirra
4. Judd
3. Glass
2. Cox
1. Hunter

Wirra is the only player I even feel like giving votes, Judd kicked 2 of our four goals, Glass could probably say he did enough to beat Hall. The last two votes could have gone to anyone...

 

[Deegle]

Cr@p what an empty feeling, hmm i spose if i had to give votes these guys deserve them

5. Wirrapunda
4. Judd
3. Cox
2. Banfield
1. Fletcher

 

[eagleskickass]

5. Wirrapunda
4. Judd
3. Cox
2. Banfield
1. Fletcher

agree with regal_eagle, as the votes suggest.

 

[underthebridge]

5. Judd - 9 tackles
4. Wirrpunda
3. Cos
2. Banfield
1. Chick - was asked to take on o'loughlin, and tried his heart out.

 

[jess-jess]

5. Wirrpunda
4. Judd
3. Cox
2. Banfield
1. Fletcher

 

[Mr Q]

5. Wirrpunda
4. Banfield
3. Judd
2. Cox
1. Fletcher

Hunter is about the only other player I'd consider for votes.

 

[E2EK1EL]

5: Judd
4: Wirra
3: Banners
2: Fletcher
1: Glass

 

[daddy_4_eyes]

I'm surprised Cox is getting so many votes, I thought he was easily beaten by Ball. In fact, Cox had to resort to staging for free kicks at all ball ups, and only really did anything of note when Ball was on the bench resting.

That said, the rest of the squad wasn't much better.

 

[Milkman]

5. Wirrpunda
4. Judd


3. Banfield
2. Glass
1. Chick

 

[Ruddiger]

5. Judd - great work, but little support
4. Wirrapunda - the rock
3. Cox - 35 hit outs
2. Banfield - Hope he stays as long as possible
1. Fletcher - Star player, but a bit of a quieter night

Sampi was decent too.
Don't think we can blame the weather, it just came down to a more experience Sydney team.

 

[Goldenblue]

5. Judd
4. Cox
3. Wirrpunda
2. Hunter
1. Fletcher

 

[andrew_embley]

5) Embley
4) Wirrpunda
3) Judd
2) Banfield
1) Fletcher


Dunno y Embers ain't gettn many votes. Ok, maybe 5 may be a bit too much and his possesions may not hav been that damaging but......

Question: Didn't KIRK start on Embers? (shows how highly regarded he was by the coaching staff)

 

[Nitro82]

5. Judd
4. Wirra
3. Banners
2. Hunter
1. Fletcher

 

[larrikin]

5 - Banfield - i thought he was quite clearly our best, and he didn't have much support
4 - Wirra
3 - Judd - 2 goals hid the flogging he got from Williams in the 2nd quarter a bit

Beyond that I'm struggling

2 - Chick - Tried hard
1 - Fletcher

Awful game for us, and a really terrible way to go out.

 

[peterss]

5 Wirra
4 Judd
3 Banfield
2 Fletcher
1 Cox

 

[Thrawn666]

Are you including finals votes in the BFWCPOTY Jod?

 

[Eagles4Ever]

5. Judd
4. Wirrpunda
3. Banfield
2. Hunter
1. Glass

 

[franky_mojojo]

5 Wirra
4 Judd
3 Cox
2 Embley
1 Glass