Remove this Banner Ad

Warnock delays contract talks

  • Thread starter Thread starter rgauci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

even if he wants to go an has told the club the same thing i think we should play him every week unless he shows real poor form.

The more he plays more chance he has to impress future team meaning we can hopefully get more for the trade.

If he doesnt play much we will get not much at all for him
but ofcourse if he plays an has real bad games week in week out that will mean we get less for the trade
 
I'll be devastated if he goes. He has such potential. Plus he's my new Justin. ;):o
 
even if he wants to go an has told the club the same thing i think we should play him every week unless he shows real poor form.

The more he plays more chance he has to impress future team meaning we can hopefully get more for the trade.

If he doesnt play much we will get not much at all for him
but ofcourse if he plays an has real bad games week in week out that will mean we get less for the trade

I think at the moment he is showing some pretty poor form Sman.

I'm in two minds on Warnock. I'm not a fan of Gilmore anywhere in the team, but I also want to see Sandilands getting some support. The backline injuries will probably save Gilmore this week, but if that is the case, he's not going to be available to help out in the ruck. I'd like to continue to see players getting what they deserve and right now I don't think Warnock deserves to be playing for Fremantle, but we may not have any other option.

I think what we do need to do is take a step back from all this crap though. We've had the ridiculous Tarrant rumours, the McManus rumours and now it's Warnock's turn. I have no doubt that they'll just move onto the next target when they've caused enough trouble - we need to learn to just ignore it.
 
If Harvey sees it as a rotational problem having two ruckman in the team fine, i can accept that - although every other team in the AFL can manage it well enough - .


The problem is the size of the pair of them. Neither Sandi or Warnock have shown much deep in attack, so we'd probably have a giant sitting on the bench for 90% of each game if both are selected. Warnock and the 198cm Longmuir would have been a very good combination, but having a ruckman that is 206cm as back up to a guy who is 211cm hurts our mobility. You just can't have them both on the park at once.

Warnock will get his chance, but he needs to work harder at WAFL level and force them to pick him.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The problem is the size of the pair of them. Neither Sandi or Warnock have shown much deep in attack, so we'd probably have a giant sitting on the bench for 90% of each game if both are selected. Warnock and the 198cm Longmuir would have been a very good combination, but having a ruckman that is 206cm as back up to a guy who is 211cm hurts our mobility. You just can't have them both on the park at once.

Warnock will get his chance, but he needs to work harder at WAFL level and force them to pick him.

I think that could change though dom. The main reluctance so far with playing Sandi up forward has been his weakness with his marking. He's figured it out now and it should be virtually impossible to legally prevent him from getting it most times. He's got a very good kick on him as well. It probably does make it difficult to play the two ruckmen as well as Pav, Taz and Murphy though.

eta : Very much in agreeance with your last sentence. We finally have a coach selecting a team on form. I hope Harvs sticks with it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom