"We apologise and take full responsibility; but it's all Ross Lyon's fault, it's only worth three weeks anyway and something something fantasy golf game."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Agree the fact Mitchell got off for that is a joke. Height notwithstanding he tried to belt a bloke in the head, while the ball wasn't even in play. Should've gone no worries at all.If Gaff had hit Brayshaw slightly differently, Brayshaw does not break his jaw and he gets 1 or 2 weeks.
The intent should should be graded on equal basis to the impact, and if you throw a punch or elbow you should get 1 week.
Tom Mitchell Elbowed someone off the ball, and did not get 1 week.
He swung a punch to his chest, with the intent of pushing him out of the way, because Brayshaw had just run up to him to block his run.
That was my take on his evidence.
As Brayshaw was moving past him, to his left and crouched forward, the fist landed flush with Brayshaws jaw, cleaning him up.
He admits the strike, that it got him high, and that it caused severe impact. First thing he did at the tribunal was plead guilty to all three of those elements.
He has the right to explain what he was trying to do.
Come on people; it's not like Gaff walked over to the kid and lined up his face and went whack.
I await Freo fans assessment of Jack Riewoldt saying Gaff was aiming for the gut.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
What if it was a punch to the gut and the player died after the game not knowing about the internal injuries?Jail for manslaughter.
As cowardly as what bachar houli did to the poor Carlton player last year if you can remember that oneShould get atleast 6...
Who’d want him after that coward punch? Hitting a kid FFS.
Video here. Please watch before commenting:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-06/brayshaw-gaff-why-random-act-of-violence-is-shocking/10076978
- Chief
Mate.I was referring to the 35-40 weeks...
He also said he was happy with 8 and said it could have been more.
Wait, didn't you say 8 weeks?He got 8 matches not 35-40 weeks... lmao
So is Jack R delusional?
Because apparently all WCE fans are delusional for saying Gaff was aiming for the his chest.
Nahhhh, they will string the news cycle out longer.the bolded is the key. the media will move onto the next jake king story, or danger busting a toe nail surfing in his suit, or bomber t and his soap opera. there is always something coming down the pike
10 teams over two means the focus gets spread
Very hard to read the way he defend himself in the tribunal .One minute he said stomach the next chest .Was gaff remorseful because he punched the bloke or Brownlow medal and chance of winning a flag were gone?
Nahhhh, they will string the news cycle out longer.
Every new change will be a media event. With far larger focus. New club, first day back, first run in with Brayshaw, why aren't you talking to the press, first game against WC, against Fremantle, every coach, teammate etc. will be a chance for an interview.
Was gaff remorseful because he punched the bloke or Brownlow medal and chance of winning a flag were gone?
He said he was suspended for 8 weeks, I corrected him and said 8 matches. I never said he was suspended for 35-40 weeks, simply that he wouldn't play for that long and that a comparison can't really be made, given completely different circumstances.Fair enough then.
Agree the fact Mitchell got off for that is a joke. Height notwithstanding he tried to belt a bloke in the head, while the ball wasn't even in play. Should've gone no worries at all.
Yes , I did say that.The above from the same bloke that said last year "Dawson in, to hurt as many weagles as possible and then retire eg Dale Kickett style".
Now up in arms?
Hypocrisy springs to mind.
Why would it?and it wont be worse in WA?
Agree its the way it is for now. Still, fun to discuss in hope the AFL may one day listen.And if Goldstein's jaw got broken he would've copped a lengthy spell too.
In the end it is the result that often informs the suspension - if any. Gaff deserved eight under the current system of how the AFL and tribunal treat suspendable offences. Not saying it's right or wrong, by the way - just the way it is.

Eagles CEO - waited far too long to make a statement then said they played golf together - complete fabrication.
Eagles Coach - says he believes it wasn’t intentional & made a fool of himself
Eagles Lawyer - we want 3 week.
Gaff - I apologize and take full responsibility & hope Brayshaw recovers quickly.
Only bloke to not embarrass himself after the incident at the Eagles is the bloke who punched Brayshaw.
Genuinely felt for Gaff speaking after and accept he’s remorseful. Apparently will meet Angus while in melb and expect the family will then all move on.
Why would it?
The majority of media are based in Vic. Local papers aren't much, compared to nationally syndicated shitshows.
Mate.
Smith's penalty was OTT. A different sport, different circumstances, and applied in a different way.
You were a legit ******* moron, in the way you compared them. I was chill about it, more than I should have been.
Cheating tends to attract extreme sanctions. That's because it undermines the integrity of the game. In this case a global competition with hundreds of millions passing through betting markets, sponsorships etc. It's also the way they handled the situation, being team leaders.
The penalty was one measured in time.
Gaff's was a penalty measured in matches. They made sure that the penalty strayed into next season. Yes Smith's was longer, and yes, for Gaff, the penalty will include the offseason. Smith's also includes downtime, but they aren't really comparable.
Not in any way.
If you had complained that he should have been charged, due to the severity of punching someone, then fine. But to compare wildly different circumstances across codes is absurd. If it's a violence v cheating argument, well a few of the gutless cowards on your side should be sitting out for a while then.
How many grubs is it now? Vickery (gone), Conca, Cotchin, Houli and Rance?