- Joined
- Mar 2, 2007
- Posts
- 44,216
- Reaction score
- 67,213
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Cowboys, Packers, Scorchers
Here's a post from a Saints website by a guy who is apparently in the know. Doesn't paint a great picture of Watters.
Everyone has been asking me why Watters is no longer coach, what were the reasons behind his sacking.
I won't break any confidence but I will highlight some grabs of some of the articles from journos today, all of these bits are accurate, there is a lot more not reported and better that it doesn't come out.
The club have been measured at not baking Scott in public.
Here are only the truths taken out of each article as reported in the paper:
Jon Ralph - Herald Sun
* In truth it was a decision that had been building for the last six weeks of the season, influenced by poor relationships with players, assistant coaches and the board.
* Right or wrong, St Kilda has lost all faith in Watters.
* In attempting to take control of this club he put too many noses out of joint.
* Assistant coaches said he began taking every facet of training, effectively selecting the team by himself, and all but abandoning match committee at times.
* St Kilda players who had achieved plenty under Ross Lyon felt he gave them no credit for their achievements in that time, as he attempted to rid the club of Lyon's tactics and legacy.
* The whispering campaign became stronger as assistants, football managers and development coaches left the club. Sources within St Kilda were telling the Herald Sun that they held Watters responsible for that exodus.
* Too many believed he did not have an upside as a coach.
* His mixed messages also hurt him.
Sam Edmund and Scott Gullan - Herald Sun
* There were also increasing concerns over his coaching, particularly on match day, where frequently changing tactics and mixed messages were common.
* It came after Thompson’s review of the football department revealed an “endorsement that we have the right people in the right roles”. But in the weeks since the club had become convinced that Watters’ behaviour wasn’t going to change.
Jay Clark - Herald Sun
* Simply, some people felt they could not trust the coach any more. Not his behaviour or his football teachings.
* He assured Saints fans everyone was on the same page at Seaford, but it could not have been further from the truth, following breakdowns in relationships with key football officials and senior players.
* Yesterday may look like a disaster, but the board decided things were only going to get worse had Watters stayed, which is why the trigger was pulled.
Mark Robinson - Herald Sun
* Scott Watters was delusional.
* In the end he was delusional about his power at the club, delusional about his support, and, most importantly, delusional about his standing against the new head of football Chris Pelchen.
* You coach, he was told, and leave the running of the football department to Pelchen. Watters agreed to the "buy-in", but over the next two weeks, continued to act the all-encompassing football coach.
* In effect, Watters couldn't or wouldn't let go.
* It was known that Watters and Pelchen had an uneasy relationship, which affected the large group of support staff.
* It has been said that Watters wasn't too choosy with who he aired his dirty laundry with, which included members of staff, which is always fraught.
* There was also the savaging Watters gave the group after the dwarf fire debacle, which has been described as withering.
* It has also been said Watters address at the club's best and fairest, where he spoke about not accepting mediocrity bemused the gang of 2009 and 2010.
* He played Ahmed Saad at the Gabba in the week it was revealed he'd had tested positive to taking a performance-enhancing drug.
* That's all good, the support of the coach to a player, but it's believed the executive didn't know of the decision.
* Watters' dismissal isn't down to one act or one conversation, it's about a collective which finally skewered him.
Caroline Wilson - The Age
* Watters was placed on a short leash, yet continued to insist he would soon receive the contract extension that had appeared to become an obsession with him. How he could have so misunderstood his position remains a mystery.
* The decision to play Ahmed Saad despite the positive banned substance sample hanging over the club was one example of the coach bypassing process and going to the board.
* That and Watters' tendency to turn to board members as his power base and not his immediate superiors.
* The coach's poor relationship with more experienced players has been well documented and became poisonous after the Mad Monday episode in which certain players not only allowed one dwarf entertainer to be set alight but also hired those entertainers in the first place as a dig at the coach.
* Watters insisted as recently as Friday morning that too much was being read into staff departures when, again, he appears to be in denial. Jaymie Graham chose to return to Perth reportedly for family reasons but other coaches at the club claim he no longer wanted to work with Watters, who lost two high-performance bosses in two years and then, several days ago, Dean Laidley. There were fears more would leave.
* And Watters never became comfortable working in the shadow of Ross Lyon's legacy.
* Even in recent weeks as the fallout from the football review continued the board became aware that younger coaches too often felt they were working in a climate of fear.
* His vision of his own role was of a soccer-style manager who during the season flew to woo players for the future.












