- Banned
- #1
Travis Varcoe has been a very good pick-up for Collingwood this year, played very well last Thursday night, and looks like coming out the best of the three way trade, with Mitch Clark injured and Lumumba struggling.
Meto and his mates bagged Varcoe on this board for years. There was no let-up.
I admit, early years, Varcoe needed to work harder, and was just on the fringes of the team. But he showed in the 2011 GF that he can produce big performances in big games.
Also, Varcoe played an instrumental role in the 2009 GF, when he handballed off the pack to Paul Chapman, who kicked the winning goal.
However, people turned on him in 2012, when he didn't live up to GF form. But he was injured all of 2012, came back in 2013, did his shoulder and missed 10 weeks. Yet Meto and mates expected Varcoe to be in stellar form coming back from back-to-back injuries.
Also, Varcoe was solely blamed for us missing the 2013 GF, because he kicked a behind on the run in the dying minutes, instead of a goal in the PF. Firstly, a goal wouldn't have won us the game, it would have only tied it, sending it into extra time. Geelong were buggered on their feet, while Hawthorn were still up and about, and I think they would have blown us away in that extra ten minutes. So, Varcoe WASN'T the reason we missed the GF.
I also think that maybe we should have kept Varcoe, and offered something else to get Mitch Clark instead. We lost Christensen to Brisbane, so already lost some pace. So, by losing Varcoe as well, we lost two runners.
Are you still glad we got rid of Varcoe, or do you think that we could do with him now, and maybe Travis Varcoe in 2015 form would help us, or not?
Meto and his mates bagged Varcoe on this board for years. There was no let-up.
I admit, early years, Varcoe needed to work harder, and was just on the fringes of the team. But he showed in the 2011 GF that he can produce big performances in big games.
Also, Varcoe played an instrumental role in the 2009 GF, when he handballed off the pack to Paul Chapman, who kicked the winning goal.
However, people turned on him in 2012, when he didn't live up to GF form. But he was injured all of 2012, came back in 2013, did his shoulder and missed 10 weeks. Yet Meto and mates expected Varcoe to be in stellar form coming back from back-to-back injuries.
Also, Varcoe was solely blamed for us missing the 2013 GF, because he kicked a behind on the run in the dying minutes, instead of a goal in the PF. Firstly, a goal wouldn't have won us the game, it would have only tied it, sending it into extra time. Geelong were buggered on their feet, while Hawthorn were still up and about, and I think they would have blown us away in that extra ten minutes. So, Varcoe WASN'T the reason we missed the GF.
I also think that maybe we should have kept Varcoe, and offered something else to get Mitch Clark instead. We lost Christensen to Brisbane, so already lost some pace. So, by losing Varcoe as well, we lost two runners.
Are you still glad we got rid of Varcoe, or do you think that we could do with him now, and maybe Travis Varcoe in 2015 form would help us, or not?



