Remove this Banner Ad

What do you do with Shane Watson?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

@Moderators - please ban whoever supports Watson from this thread... Just ban them from bigfooty altogether, or at least the cricket board. They must be doped up on quaaludes or something

I agree lol, we get rid of him and then they want him back!
 
@Moderators - please ban whoever supports Watson from this thread... Just ban them from bigfooty altogether, or at least the cricket board. They must be doped up on quaaludes or something
Barking up the wrong tree brutha. One of the mods is pro Watson:oops:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He has the same strike rate as Mitch Marsh? Even though he bats higher up the order.

He's also been one of the best T20 players in the world. I can't agree with that.

Mitch marsh significantly more upside

From what I've seen, you'd rather the like of maxwell and fawkner around there

I don't want t20 so I wouldn't know
 
Mitch marsh significantly more upside

From what I've seen, you'd rather the like of maxwell and fawkner around there

I don't want t20 so I wouldn't know
Might have more upside but not right now. Shouldnt be in the Squad. Faulkner shouldn't be either, should have a real bowler in there.
 
Might have more upside but not right now. Shouldnt be in the Squad. Faulkner shouldn't be either, should have a real bowler in there.
ODI's? Faulkner shouldn't be in there? Is that what you're saying?
 
ODI's? Faulkner shouldn't be in there? Is that what you're saying?
Any sportsperson that has been put on Brades' poison list early in their career is automatically locked in there for life no matter how well they subsequently perform ;)
 
This bloke doesn't rate D. Warner.
So moron status confirmed. Good to know:thumbsu:

No Faulkner, **** me I read some stupid shit on this site.
 
ODI's? Faulkner shouldn't be in there? Is that what you're saying?
For the odd innings he's actually needed with the bat to slog at the end, he's not a good steady batter required in case you lose wickets quickly. His bowling is also trash and probably outside the top 20 in Australia.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

For the odd innings he's actually needed with the bat to slog at the end, he's not a good steady batter required in case you lose wickets quickly. His bowling is also trash and probably outside the top 20 in Australia.
Yeh this is too stupid to even dignify with an argument.
 
Any sportsperson that has been put on Brades poison list early in their career is automatically locked in there for life no matter how well they subsequently perform ;)
Because they turn out crap. Palmer, Thornton, Hinkley etc at Freo. People can give me shit all they want for disliking players but I'm a very good judge of talent.
 
Yeh this is too stupid to even dignify with an argument.
Ok, so put up an argument or stop abusing me for having a differing opinion. It is not hard to stop being a child.
 
Apparently that crab Shane Watson is back in the side today. Honestly, why do the Australian cricket selectors give him so many opportunities?
Why do they give Dave Warner, Aaron Finch, Glenn Maxwell, Mitch Marsh, Pat Cummins etc so many opportunities?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Why do they give Dave Warner, Aaron Finch, Glenn Maxwell, Mitch Marsh, Pat Cummins etc so many opportunities?

Are you serious with that quote?

Shane Watson has averaged 24.5 with the bat in his 10 ODI's and I think taken two wickets at 87.

Warner, Finch, Maxwell, Marsh and Cummins have the ability to win the match with either bat (Warner, Finch, Maxwell, Marsh) or ball (Maxwell, Marsh, Cummins). Marsh has already taken one five-wicket haul in this World Cup.
 
Are you serious with that quote?

Shane Watson has averaged 24.5 with the bat in his 10 ODI's and I think taken two wickets at 87.

Warner, Finch, Maxwell, Marsh and Cummins have the ability to win the match with either bat (Warner, Finch, Maxwell, Marsh) or ball (Maxwell, Marsh, Cummins). Marsh has already taken one five-wicket haul in this World Cup.
Watson has the ability to win the match with either bat or ball... whats your point? Marsh hasn't made a run, Warner hasn't made a run against a non-associate side. Finch can only make runs on the MCG. Maxwell can either make 60 off 20 or 1 off of 2. Cummins goes for 6 an over while not threatening to take wickets, usually only picking up slog wickets.
 
What's so good about wAtson he comes straight back in

They probably want "balance" to the side. I'm guessing the thinking is having Maxwell and M.Marsh at 5 and 6 doesn't work for balance. Mind you if Watson doesn't enough runs it's a false balance.
 
Marsh and Watson are very close when it comes to that last all rounder spot. I don't mind either way, as long as Smith comes in at 3.

Watson had been poor over the last 18 months but he has had a fantastic career and maybe deserves another crack before the finals. Marsh has been solid but hasn't been great himself.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom