- Dec 5, 2012
- 14,687
- 40,629
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Knicks, Giants
Hopper to the Cats or Hawks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I'd offer 2025 R2x2,2026R1, 2027 R1 for Curtain + 2026 R3 + 2027 R3. Today, no question.Reminds me of the time on here some Melbourne fans were describing Sam Blease as having the best attributes of Jimmy Bartel and Ben Cousins. Not that he could maybe hope one day to have a career that was within sight of either of them, but a hybrid mashup of their strengths.
Curtin looks great, but let’s not put him in the team of the century just yet.
I'd offer 2025 R2x2,2026R1, 2027 R1 for Curtain + 2026 R3 + 2027 R3. Today, no question.
Kid can play. A lot.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You'd think so!If I'm reading that right, 2 firsts, 2 seconds for Curtin and 2 thirds? And North's picks are pretty high.
As good as Curtin is or might be, wouldn't Adelaide just take that bonanza of a deal and move on?
List wealth!
*Butters to Hawthorn
*Nas to Port
*MacKenzie, Carltons 1st and Pick #20 (Worpel compo) to St Kilda.
There will be some extra pieces but this as the core.
If butters does leave, it will be to the bulldogs. The only reason hawthorn are even talked about is because they put their hat in the ring for every up for grabs player. See Smith, Allen, Esava etc.*Butters to Hawthorn
*Nas to Port
*MacKenzie, Carltons 1st and Pick #20 (Worpel compo) to St Kilda.
There will be some extra pieces but this as the core.
Irrespective, NAS will cost more than that.If butters does leave, it will be to the bulldogs. The only reason hawthorn are even talked about is because they put their hat in the ring for every up for grabs player. See Smith, Allen, Esava etc.
It's a good deal for Hawthorn and St Kilda. Poor deal for Port as Butters is better than NAS and has proved it for longer as well.Irrespective, NAS will cost more than that.
If the draft was normal it'd be about right, I think. But it's a crap draft and Saints rightfully will demand more.
I think you're wrong. Butters has never been as damaging as NAS is currently. Not to mention Butters' injury issues.It's a good deal for Hawthorn and St Kilda. Poor deal for Port as Butters is better than NAS and has proved it for longer as well.
That’s way unders for both players.This might be mentioned already, but a 3 way trade for NAS, Butters, Carlton 2025r1 ( say 7).
Butters to Hawthorn for say 7, 25,Hawks 2026r1.
Port then trade 7, Hawks 2026r1, ports 2026r2 to St kilda for NAS.
I am just speculating, I can't see how Port get Nas without losing Butters.Perhaps Hawthorn add 2027r1 to the deal.
Turning 32 years old passHawks defender to Bulldogs.
Thinking Sam Frost
No current season stats available
After tonight you’d take himTurning 32 years old pass
I would rather recruit a dead corpse over Sam FrostAfter tonight you’d take him
Would be your best actual defender
Then you will finishes 7-9 again and get monstered by teams playing 3 tall forwardsI would rather recruit a dead corpse over Sam Frost
Darcy Parish to Geelong