Messenger
No, I’m just disappointed
Easy with the bold, tiger. I know all this, and have acknowledged all this. But I don't think you know what my argument is.
My original argument - in fact, my only argument - is that employers (principally banks, government departments and consultancy firms) treating law degrees as an extra-prestigious generalist degree rather than a professional qualification leads to the situation you describe - a number of top achievers at high school doing the degree because it keeps their options open.
I understand why the students do it. But I think the whole situation locks a number of people out of the degree who would be quite capable lawyers, and who would love to practice. Instead, they either miss out on the degree, or end up studying 2nd-rate degrees which, as you point out, often don't really leave them with a whole lot of options on graduating.
I did not do law. Anyway, if you look at the vast majority of courses with high TER requirements, yes the demand of the degree is overwhelming, however one must think about why that course is demanded so heavily in the first place. You cannot dismiss the degree's difficulty so simply. The demand is largely influenced by the attractiveness of the career offered at the end of the road, and the attractiveness has much to do with financial prospects (as well as so many other aspects, but why wouldn't an academic achiever want to be financially stable?). Why are financial prospects often good? Because in the real world, these careers require intelligent people (employers are going to want the best thinkers from those available), and so these people are going to be rewarded financially well because they are going to perform better at the required tasks (that are difficult in nature anyway) than people that are less intelligent than themselves (I realise this sounds elitist). It only makes sense to give places to those that are more likely to understand the material better. That's not to say that people that didn't get into the degree wouldn't be able to succeed, but when you're presented with limited places, then why wouldn't you choose the students that have a stronger guarantee of being able to understand the subject matter.
I think you're proving JMoore's point there. Law as an aptitude test rather than a career.