madtiger2005
Club Legend
I would have delisted him before Blumfield for sure.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Why is Hilton still on the list?
- Thread starter madtiger2005
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Dec 8, 2003
- 7,013
- 12,171
- AFL Club
- Richmond
I agree
On what basis ? Word around the campfire was that Blumfields attitude was pretty ordinary . The view is he never wanted to be at punt rd. in the first place .
At least Rory has a dip
Based on your views on the Zantuck thread wrennyboy we would have Zantuck out the door first closely followed by Blumfield . And this is how it should be ( no offence )
At least Rory has a dip
Based on your views on the Zantuck thread wrennyboy we would have Zantuck out the door first closely followed by Blumfield . And this is how it should be ( no offence )
oxx
Norm Smith Medallist
The fact that Blumfield came to another club and
persisted with a cowardly attitude speaks volumes
about his shortcomings.
Little baby !
If i was coaching and he were picked up by the bombers
I'd make sure he left the ground on a stretcher.
******** him.
persisted with a cowardly attitude speaks volumes
about his shortcomings.
Little baby !
If i was coaching and he were picked up by the bombers
I'd make sure he left the ground on a stretcher.
******** him.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
from comments i heard terry make on white line fever, i think he sees something in rory. not a big deal really, he will spend most of next year on the long term injury list which will allow the promotion of a rookie if we want. then he can have a shot at resurecting his career. is a handy player if he can get over the injuries.
Agree that he is a handy player, obviously has some talent but I question his commitment at times, which may have to do with him being fairly injury prone. If he's on a fairly minimal contract then he could be worth keeping for a year under TW to see what he can do.
madtiger2005
Club Legend
- Thread starter
- #9
Hilton has been with us for about 6 years and he would have played about 10 very good games in that time. Too many injuries and when he gets the chance he only plays one good game in every 5. He's rubbish 
. I'd rather persuade Zantuck to stay
. I'd rather persuade Zantuck to staymadtiger2005 said:Hilton has been with us for about 6 years and he would have played about 10 very good games in that time. Too many injuries and when he gets the chance he only plays one good game in every 5. He's rubbish
why do you want zantuck to stay so much?
he hasnt done ******** all for the club... dont get me wrong, but he can be a good footballer at times! but if he wants to boost his career he has to find elswhere, and that is what he is doing. he doesnt have true passion to be at our club so why would we persuade him to stay?
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
madtiger2005 said:Hilton has been with us for about 6 years and he would have played about 10 very good games in that time. Too many injuries and when he gets the chance he only plays one good game in every 5. He's rubbish
You said it all right there.We've had this guy on the list for years.And for what.
He was going to be delisted before doing his knee a few weeks ago and now we keep him? I was hoping we'd stopped providing a retirement home for some of these guys when we retired Kellaway.D. and Rogers.It appears we havn't.Chuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum(p)!
For what its worth i am not saying we should keep him, only my feeling on what TW has said. IF any more are shown the door i would say he would top the list.
- Aug 11, 2004
- 2,113
- 1,428
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Formerly Orlando Magic
If we didn't have so many rookies who need game experience, i'd say keep him. But I do applaud him for some of his gutsy efforts.
I'm as suprised as you all...why is Paris still on the A-List?
I remmeber plough on 3aw asking the question to the rest of the team, (it seemed like he was thinking out aloud more than anything) posing the question what would you do with rory?, in a nutshell he said, hed probably give him a chance b/c hes just entering that age bracket where the body has matured for senior footy 24+ still with potentially plenty of footy left in him.
Theres no doubt he sees something in Rory, I also remember him stating (i think it was after we beat them by 2 points in the knighter V libba return bout) that players like rory are very good and damaging wen they are running ahead of the ball, or something to that effect.
Theres no doubt he sees something in Rory, I also remember him stating (i think it was after we beat them by 2 points in the knighter V libba return bout) that players like rory are very good and damaging wen they are running ahead of the ball, or something to that effect.
he probly thinks he has been poorly coached, and lets face it, he is right. plough just may have some plans for him that might work. spud had him all over the place, and he never had a chance to settle into a position. remembering hilts face when he threw his boots over the fence after doing his knee, the guy has feeling and may take one last chance with both hands.
