I too am outraged
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
your obviously dying for someone to ask you what that detail is...so just tell us.I dont find it offensive
but if you just changed a tiny detail ... others mighty
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It means she is a object. A stocking.
I personally dont give a ****ing crap and am not actually outraged. Im just outraged at the inconsistency of it all.
Now< that you've pointed out what you're really thinking.
2nd hand outrageYou didn't witness what the GWS players did.. so how could you be offended by it?
Geewizz, they look so perfect, utterly.![]()
This is crass and probably worse then what the GWS players were told off for but apparently this is funny and not worth worrying about? Seems a odd double standard to me.
I guess one is well liked by the media and the others are not. That simple
A good looking coupleHe’s done well for himself.
A good looking couple
Yes they are, but is she that desperate to become a wag that she will allow him to demean her like that? I thought the AFL was all about respecting women?
An awful lot of assumptions there.allow him to demean her
An awful lot of assumptions there.
That she thinks it's demeaning or that it wasn't her idea lolOh, such as?
That she is desperate to be a WAG.Oh, such as?
you're suggesting women have no agency or that they can't (heh) poke fun at themselves. enough with the hand wringing political correctness. if you think that women aren't/can't be crude, you're laughably naive.Yes they are, but is she that desperate to become a wag that she will allow him to demean her like that? I thought the AFL was all about respecting women?
It's a light hearted joke between a couple who have this thing called sex. They thought the t-shirts were funny as they relate to Christmas and the act of having sex, hence why they posted the picture at Christmas timeOkay I can see your points, but am I missing something here? What is the meaning behind the photograph?
It was just a silly joke, they didn't make a sex tape.As a grandmother in my 60’s, I’m from a different era. I know it’s the 21st century but shouldn’t some things be kept private? It may have been meant as a joke but it’s a bit of a tasteless one.
Rest assured gambinotosserflog I am certainly not ‘hand wringing’ over this and I can be as politically incorrect and crude as the next person when I want to be.
If the young woman is happy for this photo to be out there that’s fine. I wonder what her ‘oldies’ thought about it?
Unfortunately consent is hard for some people to graspThe fact that this thread exists tells me there are a fair few people that genuinely don't understand the GWS controversy.
And you know what? If you're genuinely too dumb to understand the difference between a sex joke and a rape joke then I can understand being confused as to why GWS's mad monday resulted in a scandal.
I'm guessing Kris Kringle isn't big in their householda player openly bragging about inserting christmas presents into a lady's vagina is not a good look. afl needs to act.