Conspiracy Theory World Economic Forum

[Malifice]

No evidence evolution is real

Other than the fossil record, DNA evidence, the fact closely related species can breed with each other (lions and tigers, zebras and horses) and testing and confirmation of the theory by literally hundreds of thousands of scientists, anthropologists, geneticists and so forth over hundreds of years.

 

[zill]

Rubbish. Trusting provable facts is sensible and appropriate. Trusting imaginary creatures is the opposite.

You don't need to trust, or have faith in, provable facts.

 

[zill]

No, it's not.

There is no such thing as scientific fact. Only scientific theory. No theory (from Relativity to Evolution to Gravity to Quantum physics to Medicine) is 'fact'.

That's why we call them theories. Not the 'fact' of evolution or the 'fact' of relativity. The theory of evolution, or the theory of relativity.

You posit a falsifiable (able to be proven wrong) theory. Other scientists then do their damn best to attack your theory and prove it wrong, with empirical experimentation. The more they fail, the stronger (and more probable) your theory becomes.

I dont know (for a fact) that Einstein was correct with relativity. But I trust that he is (a shitload of scientists have spent a shitload of time and experimentation trying to prove him wrong, and failed).

You're wrong about that though. There are provable facts. That you choose to trust someone elses theory doesn't make that theory any more or less likely to be true.

 

[Malifice]

You're wrong about that though.

No, I'm not.

A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be or that has been repeatedly tested and has corroborating evidence in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment. In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.

A scientific theory differs from a scientific fact: a fact is an observation and a theory organizes and explains multiple observations. Furthermore, a theory is expected to make predictions which could be confirmed or refuted with addition observations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory#:~:text=A scientific theory is a,accounts of the real world.

A scientific theory must also have the following:

Falsifiability (or refutability) is a deductive standard of evaluation of scientific theories and hypotheses, introduced by the philosopher of science Karl Popper in his book The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934). A theory or hypothesis is falsifiable if it can be logically contradicted by an empirical test.

As a key notion in the separation of science from non-science and pseudoscience, falsifiability has featured prominently in many scientific controversies and applications, even being used as legal precedent. However, falsifiability is not a sufficient condition for demarcating science as theories have to actually be tested in order to eliminate theories that are wrong. In scientific practice, this can cause theories to change from being falsified back to unfalsified, such as when the once-falsified geocentric world view was restored as a viable reference frame within special relativity. There is ambiguity surrounding the status of theories that cannot currently be tested.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

Instead of crapping on about the Rothschilds, I suggest learning how actual facts and actual truth works.

 

[zill]

No, I'm not.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory#:~:text=A scientific theory is a,accounts of the real world.

A scientific theory must also have the following:




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

Instead of crapping on about the Rothschilds, I suggest learning how actual facts and actual truth works.

I know what a theory is. In your previous post you said there was no such thing as a scientific fact, which is wrong.

 

[Malifice]

I know what a theory is. In your previous post you said there was no such thing as a scientific fact, which is wrong.

No, it's never 'true'. It may be accepted as such, but it's not science unless you're prepared to deviate from that assumption.

In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science, however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow.

https://ncse.ngo/definitions-fact-t... has,leading to deductions that can be tested.

For example, while we can say today it's a 'fact' that light travels at 299,792,458 m/s in a vacuum, that fact might not always be true, and we need to be open to the possibility that some new theory might come along to show us we were wrong in that measurement.

 

[zill]

No, it's never 'true'. It may be accepted as such, but it's not science unless you're prepared to deviate from that assumption.



https://ncse.ngo/definitions-fact-theory-and-law-scientific-work#:~:text=Fact: In science, an observation that has,leading to deductions that can be tested.

For example, while we can say today it's a 'fact' that light travels at 299,792,458 m/s in a vacuum, that fact might not always be true, and we need to be open to the possibility that some new theory might come along to show us we were wrong in that measurement.

So what you're saying is the earth might be flat? I was under the impression this it was able to be verified as a globe but I will defer to you on this issue.

 

[sdfc]

Genetic mutation is not random. It's guided by natural selection and environment.

You've got your own version of evolution there. The mutations are random in mainstream theory but I'm keen to hear about yours.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

You don't need to trust, or have faith in, provable facts.

You know someone is struggling when they go down the semantics path. I originally described those who believe in religion as having faith - it's the well-known terminology. But clearly it's what you believe that matters.

The point I am making (and you refuse to acknowledge because it takes down your whole house of cards) is that it is appropriate to believe provable facts, and inappropriate (at best) to believe in the non-existent deities, if you act and conduct yourself based on the status you import from holding that belief.

 

[Lebbo73]

So your theory is that the (Jewish) Rothschilds family, have amassed significant wealth over the years lending money to European nobility, strongly advocated for the creation of an Israeli State (in particular within the UK) before... secretly supporting the (Jew hating) Nazis to enact the Holocaust on Jewish people, with the end goal of the Rothschilds being the destruction of Israel and the eradication of Jewish people?

So more antisemitic Nazi conspiracist shit from you.

The theory that you clearly believe in that 'the Jews started WW2' has been around for a while. The Nazis also believed this to be true. It was the prime reason behind the Holocaust.

Today I will once more be a prophet: If the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!

- Adolf Hitler.

What's with you cookers and your willingness to believe in Nazi antisemitic conspiracies?

Not the Jews you looney. You know that I’m talking about the bankers that fund both sides of the war so that they win no matter who wins. The same people that create our money and then enslave us with it.

 

[Malifice]

So what you're saying is the earth might be flat?

No, I'm saying if you have a theory that the Earth is flat, feel free to publish your paper explaining your thesis in an academic journal for other scientists to attempt to falsify.

While I'm fairly confident the consensus of the worlds scientists will blow your theory out of the water, as a man of science, I'm open to any falsifiable theory you might want to advance.

That's how science works.

It's like with the COVID vaccine. None of you cookers were ever able to put up any kind of science behind your cookery, and all available science was that we were going to be fine, and that vaccination was safe and efficacious (with literally millions of data samples available to us to study).

Something that turned out to be the actual case.

I vaguely recall you and others stating it was all 'an effort by (the WEF/ Bill Gates/ Jews/ WHO/ Global Socialists) to impose one world government' or some such shit.

How did that pan out for you all?

 

[Malifice]

Not the Jews you looney. You know that I’m talking about the bankers that fund both sides of the war so that they win no matter who wins.

1) Name these bankers. Give me 5 names.

2) Why would the (Jewish) Rothschilds family finance Hitler (of all ****ing people)?

Hitler hated the Rothschilds (and other prominent Banking Families, pretty much all of them Jewish). He blamed them for the first and second world war (as do you) and used that justification as his reason for the Holocaust.

He expressly stated as much here:

During a speech at the Reichstag on 30 January 1939, Adolf Hitler, dictator of Nazi Germany, threatened "the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe" in the event of another world war:

If international finance Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, the result will be not the Bolshevization of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler's_prophecy

Hitler (and the Nazis) thought 'international banking cabals' such as the Rothschilds, Goldman Sachs, Warburgs, Lehmans (all of them Jewish) were behind a conspiracy to fund and profiteer of wars (on both sides).

Hitler also believed that these same 'international financiers' also supported leftist/ socialist political movements and were actively attempting to subvert traditional German conservative culture with decadent Woke LGBTI 'Cultural Marxism' (he called it Judeo Bolshevism) and replace or dilute the (white) German race with African/ Slavic/ Jewish and other non-white Immigration.

So exactly what you (and others on here) believe also, word for ****ing word.

You see the contemporary far right still banging on about this (debunked) conspiracy, seemingly oblivious to the fact that it's been done before (by Hitler) and was what led to the ****ing Holocaust.

 

[Malifice]

You've got your own version of evolution there. The mutations are random in mainstream theory but I'm keen to hear about yours.

No, in the context of evolution, while the occurrence of mutations is random, the process of natural selection is not random, as it favors traits that enhance survival and reproduction.

Like, you could evolve a mutation that is actively harmful to your chances at reproduction and replication of that mutation. But thanks to natural selection, those mutations tend to die out, while mutations that are actively beneficial to your chances of reproduction and replication stand a higher chance of replication and success.

Natural selection itself acts as a filter.

It's like if I shuffled a deck of cards, handed you ten at random and asked you to select the best 5 card poker hand from it. You would naturally filter out the shit and keep the good stuff.

Sometimes all you'd be left with is shit, but in that case you're probably going to lose against other players going through the same process.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

No evidence evolution is real rather it’s a Masonic creation

View attachment 2348558

Keep on cookin bro!

 

[Johnny_Dogg4]

Other than the fossil record, DNA evidence, the fact closely related species can breed with each other (lions and tigers, zebras and horses) and testing and confirmation of the theory by literally hundreds of thousands of scientists, anthropologists, geneticists and so forth over hundreds of years.

When you control the world , you control the narrative.

dinosaurs are a Masonic creation

 

[Johnny_Dogg4]

Keep on cookin bro!

I was proven correct with Israel Iran conflict thus far which was a Masonic scripted war which I said early last year and laid out the plans.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

I was proven correct with Israel Iran conflict thus far which was a Masonic scripted war which I said early last year and laid out the plans.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

When you control the world , you control the narrative.

dinosaurs are a Masonic creation

View attachment 2349382

I was proven correct with Israel Iran conflict thus far which was a Masonic scripted war which I said early last year and laid out the plans.

The scale of your ignorance is truly breathtaking. Dinosaurs are fake but we all sprang from Adam and Eve. Come on, dude.

And it's hilarious that you're still claiming credit for predicting the current conflict. There's only a few hundred million people in the world who saw it coming, and they didn't need to rely on some religious fantasy to reach that conclusion.

 

[zill]

You know someone is struggling when they go down the semantics path. I originally described those who believe in religion as having faith - it's the well-known terminology. But clearly it's what you believe that matters.

The point I am making (and you refuse to acknowledge because it takes down your whole house of cards) is that it is appropriate to believe provable facts, and inappropriate (at best) to believe in the non-existent deities, if you act and conduct yourself based on the status you import from holding that belief.

Belief, trust, faith all mean the same thing. Someones faith in a deity is much the same as someones faith in set of ridiculous health measures.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Belief, trust, faith all mean the same thing. Someones faith in a deity is much the same as someones faith in set of ridiculous health measures.

You know what, that statement of itself is factual if by "ridiculous health measures" you are referring to untested and unproven quackery that we see on the internet from time to time. Like stuff that Alex Jones touts.

Another factual statement is "someone's faith in a deity is completely different to someone's faith in set of proven health measures". This is because the faith in deity is faith in the unproven (despite tens of millions of people trying to prove it over the centuries) and thus inappropriate and frankly, stupid. On the other hand, have you ever taken medication that worked?

 

[Johnny_Dogg4]

The scale of your ignorance is truly breathtaking. Dinosaurs are fake but we all sprang from Adam and Eve. Come on, dude.

And it's hilarious that you're still claiming credit for predicting the current conflict. There's only a few hundred million people in the world who saw it coming, and they didn't need to rely on some religious fantasy to reach that conclusion.

this war is so fake and scripted, so many sources told about this war many years before it happened.

covid was fake and pre-planned so much evidence

if you believe things are random then im sorry but you're a fool

 

[LuvtheKangas]

this war is so fake and scripted, so many sources told about this war many years before it happened.

covid was fake and pre-planned so much evidence

if you believe things are random then im sorry but you're a fool

I give up, Johnny. You have proven the old adage about arguing with an idiot.

 

[Johnny_Dogg4]

I give up, Johnny. You have proven the old adage about arguing with an idiot.

what do you think they mean by the great reset ? covid, ww3 and collapsing the economy to bring in a digital cbdc system will usher in the reset with AI governance

honestly are you that blind?

 

[LuvtheKangas]

what do you think they mean by the great reset ? covid, ww3 and collapsing the economy to bring in a digital cbdc system will usher in the reset with AI governance

honestly are you that blind?
View attachment 2349407
View attachment 2349410

I'm not blind, I can see this sort of propaganda for what it is. And that's because I'm also not gullible.

I'll leave you in peace, Johnny.

 

[Johnny_Dogg4]

I'm not blind, I can see this sort of propaganda for what it is. And that's because I'm also not gullible.

I'll leave you in peace, Johnny.

So you don’t think trump investing $500 B in project stargate AI isn’t suspicious when the WEF have spoken about AI