Conspiracy Theory World Economic Forum

[Frank Bunn]

I already answered your question above.

Nope. You described people involved with the WEF as 'clowns'.

Absolutely no rebuttal on my points about David Rockefeller.

You continue to be obsessed with people making more money and less tax than you but ignore the globalist elitist groups that seek to establish and control influential supranational institutions that operate independently of national governments and without direct accountability to the voting public.

 

[Malifice]

Nope. You described people involved with the WEF as 'clowns'.

Absolutely no rebuttal on my points about David Rockefeller.

I answered your Yes or No question directly, and specified that I have an issue with billionaires using their wealth to influence policy.

Rockefeller is a billionaire. He used his wealth to influence policy.

If you want me to spell it out any further for you, or be more specific with me opposing billionaires influencing policy, I'm not sure how I can do that.

You continue to be obsessed with people making more money and less tax than you but ignore the globalist elitist groups that seek to establish and control influential supranational institutions that operate independently of national governments and without direct accountability to the voting public.

I ****ing literally mentioned Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch above.

Do they not fit the definition of 'global elites, seeking to establish and control supranational institutions, that operate independently of national governments, and without any direct accountability to the voting public'?

Ill ask you the question again.

Do you oppose Rupert Murdoch, Peter Theil, Elon Musk etc in the same way you oppose Soros, Rockerfeller and Gates?

Yes, or No.

 

[Malifice]

I actively support Australian workplace rights being wound back, their anti-market and socialist.

Minimum wage should be wound back, Australia is becoming more and more unproductive.

So you would actively support a reduction in your award wage, a lower salary, less annual leave, and your employer being able to fire you at will?

What do you do for work? My guess is you're on DSP.

Seriously, what do you do for a crust?

We need to free up the wages market, particularly with the swathes of uneducated third world migrants Labor is beckoning to our shores.

Our immigration policy is overwhelmingly (90 percent) skilled immigrants and University students.

And the policy has remained virtually the same under both Labor, and Liberal, the latter of whom have been in power for 20 out of the past 30 years.

What fantasy world are you living in?

 

[FlowersByIrene]

So you would actively support a reduction in your award wage, a lower salary, less annual leave, and your employer being able to fire you at will?

What do you do for work? My guess is you're on DSP.

Seriously, what do you do for a crust?



Our immigration policy is overwhelmingly (90 percent) skilled immigrants and University students.

And the policy has remained virtually the same under both Labor, and Liberal, the latter of whom have been in power for 20 out of the past 30 years.

What fantasy world are you living in?

Hahahaha

 

[Frank Bunn]

I answered your Yes or No question directly, and specified that I have an issue with billionaires using their wealth to influence policy.

Rockefeller is a billionaire. He used his wealth to influence policy.

If you want me to spell it out any further for you, or be more specific with me opposing billionaires influencing policy, I'm not sure how I can do that.

We are in a thread discussing the WEF. You described people involved with the WEF as 'clowns'. Yet their policies such as the 15 minute city are being promoted globally as 'urban planning’s new utopia'.

While you were banging on about billionaires making themselves richer I brought up Rockefeller's role in creating supranational institutions that operate independently of national governments and without direct accountability to the voting public. It's good to see you have come round.

I ****ing literally mentioned Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch above.

Do they not fit the definition of 'global elites, seeking to establish and control supranational institutions, that operate independently of national governments, and without any direct accountability to the voting public'?

Ill ask you the question again.

Do you oppose Rupert Murdoch, Peter Theil, Elon Musk etc in the same way you oppose Soros, Rockerfeller and Gates?

Yes, or No.

You've thrown six names in there so a yes/no answer isn't adequate. I would most oppose billionaires who have a globalist agenda and whose influence from their funding isn't transparent.

 

[Malifice]

Hahahaha

No, seriously. What do you do for a crust?

You're happy with Gina Rineheart spending millions so the government slashes award wages, and lets your boss fire you without notice, and a reduction in your annual leave entitlements and so forth for 'increased productivity'.

Do you work? In what area?

I wager you don't work at all, and likely rely on the Government (who you also seem to perversly hate).

 

[Malifice]

I would most oppose billionaires who have a globalist agenda and whose influence from their funding isn't transparent.

So you only oppose billionaires who use their money to advance globalism.

It seems to be you're perfectly fine with billionaires paying money to the government to advocate for and advance policies as long as it's not globalism.

Is it fair to say that you don't oppose billionaires who use their money to advance nationalism (the opposite of globalism)?

Yes or No.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

I actively support Australian workplace rights being wound back, their anti-market and socialist.

Minimum wage should be wound back, Australia is becoming more and more unproductive. We need to free up the wages market, particularly with the swathes of uneducated third world migrants Labor is beckoning to our shores. If we don't the only thing that is hurt is your every day Australian who gets poor service at premium prices.

View attachment 2394145

Don't be racist. You sound like a Nazi. Are you a Nazi?

 

[Malifice]

Don't be racist. You sound like a Nazi. Are you a Nazi?

He's a far right winger, who believes Liberal Democracy should be abolished in favor of an authoritarian fascist and nationalist dictatorship under an 'enlightened philosopher king', and also thinks a bunch of mainly Jewish Globalist 'financiers' (Soros, Blackrock, the Rothschilds, Golman Sachs, Warburg's, Mossad etc) along with people like Bill Gates are secretly trying to undermine 'Western culture' via 'Cultural Marxism' and 'replace the White race via a program of mass immigration of non whites.'

So other than believing in the exact same thing the Nazis did (only without the pan Germanic Völkisch stuff) and desiring a government and State basically identical to Nazi Germany here in Australia, he's definitely not a Nazi.

Because the Nazis were bad guys.

 

[zill]

He's a far right winger, who believes Liberal Democracy should be abolished in favor of an authoritarian fascist and nationalist dictatorship under an 'enlightened philosopher king', and also thinks a bunch of mainly Jewish Globalist 'financiers' (Soros, Blackrock, the Rothschilds, Golman Sachs, Warburg's, Mossad etc) along with people like Bill Gates are secretly trying to undermine 'Western culture' via 'Cultural Marxism' and 'replace the White race via a program of mass immigration of non whites.'

So other than believing in the exact same thing the Nazis did (only without the pan Germanic Völkisch stuff) and desiring a government and State basically identical to Nazi Germany here in Australia, he's definitely not a Nazi.

Because the Nazis were bad guys.

Give it a rest Mal.

 

[bourbons]

Hahahaha

Don't play the ball whatever you do

Now I too am quite interested in what you do for work, any time you're ready mate.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

He's a far right winger, who believes Liberal Democracy should be abolished in favor of an authoritarian fascist and nationalist dictatorship under an 'enlightened philosopher king', and also thinks a bunch of mainly Jewish Globalist 'financiers' (Soros, Blackrock, the Rothschilds, Golman Sachs, Warburg's, Mossad etc) along with people like Bill Gates are secretly trying to undermine 'Western culture' via 'Cultural Marxism' and 'replace the White race via a program of mass immigration of non whites.'

So other than believing in the exact same thing the Nazis did (only without the pan Germanic Völkisch stuff) and desiring a government and State basically identical to Nazi Germany here in Australia, he's definitely not a Nazi.

Because the Nazis were bad guys.

Thought so

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Don't play the ball whatever you do

Now I too am quite interested in what you do for work, any time you're ready mate.

I don't like to give out any personal information online, particularly to crazy people like some in this thread.

All I will say is, I am supremely confident in any comparison to Mal from a social, financial, professional and intellectual perspective.

 

[bourbons]

I don't like to give out any personal information online, particularly to crazy people like some in this thread.

Some form of government welfare confirmed then

All I will say is, I am supremely confident in any comparison to Mal from a social, financial, professional and intellectual perspective.

Oh, I'm sure you are

 

[Malifice]

I am supremely confident in any comparison to Mal from a social, financial, professional and intellectual perspective.

So am I mate. So am I.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

So am I mate. So am I.

 

[faible]

Some form of government welfare confirmed then


Oh, I'm sure you are

FBI is 100% the mate who rocks up with the cheapest, shittiest beer he can find, then drinks all your good stuff.

 

[Frank Bunn]

So you only oppose billionaires who use their money to advance globalism.

No. I made my position clear. I can tell it to you but I can't understand it for you.

I would most oppose billionaires who have a globalist agenda and whose influence from their funding isn't transparent.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

I don't like to give out any personal information online, particularly to crazy people like some in this thread.

All I will say is, I am supremely confident in any comparison to Mal from a social, financial, professional and intellectual perspective.

You previously said you work in a family-owned business. So, your financial comfort has been gifted to you.

You are far from superior to the majority of people in intellectual terms.

You'd be f***ed if you had to be self-made. But in that case, at least you might finally understand what social security is for.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

You previously said you work in a family-owned business. So, your financial comfort has been gifted to you.

You are far from superior to the majority of people in intellectual terms.

You'd be f***ed if you had to be self-made. But in that case, at least you might finally understand what social security is for.

When have I said that? You must be thinking of someone else. Do try and pay a litttttle bit more attention when youre abusing people

 

[LuvtheKangas]

When have I said that? You must be thinking of someone else. Do try and pay a litttttle bit more attention when youre abusing people

For clarity, are you now denying that you work in a family owned business?

 

[FlowersByIrene]

For clarity, are you now denying that you work in a family owned business?

Absolutely, I don't, have never done, and have never said I do that. You're thinking of someone else.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Absolutely, I don't, have never done, and have never said I do that. You're thinking of someone else.

OK, I must be wrong. My apologies.

 

[Malifice]

No. I made my position clear. I can tell it to you but I can't understand it for you.

I would most oppose billionaires who have a globalist agenda and whose influence from their funding isn't transparent.

You say 'No' but then repeat you only oppose globalists or those without 'transparent funding'.

What about billionaires who lack a globalist agenda?

Would you oppose a billionaire, spending millions to influence politicians to curb migration, oppose free trade, end foreign aid, wind back policies addressing climate change, and so forth as long as they were transparent about it?

Yes, or No?

 

[sdfc]

A lot of attendees at WEF events don't care about climate change either. At least the climate change sceptics (or don't give a shits) are up front about it.