Worst List?

[fryingpan]

I'd be ashamed if my side played that pathetic Crows-Swans ultraflooding stuff. It's incredibly boring, and is used to compensate for your lack of list talent. The AFL should provide discounts or free tickets for anyone willing to endure a Crows sub-10-goal flood fest.

Hmm.. if we're so poor at scoring how come our 'FOR' tally has been higher than yours for 6 consecutive years?

Because you're shit? LOLZ i know!

 

[parrot]

Hmm.. if we're so poor at scoring ...

Have you noticed TV Commentators cringe when they have to broadcast your games? A Swans V Crows ultraflood shootout is the ultimate ratings destroyer. lol.

 

[fryingpan]

Have you noticed TV Commentators cringe when they have to broadcast your games? A Swans V Crows ultraflood shootout is the ultimate ratings destroyer. lol.

Do I give a shit about TV commentators? Do I give a shit about how good TV ratings are? No. I give a shit about getting the 4 points and we've done that a lot more than your hacks in the past decade

 

[parrot]

Do I give a shit about TV commentators? Do I give a shit about how good TV ratings are? No. I give a shit about getting the 4 points ...

Whatever it takes eh. The point is not only are you doing the game a disservice playing that pathetic ultraflooding stuff, but ultimately you will never ever be successful. At least your regional colleagues, Port, play a more entertaining brand of footy.

 

[fryingpan]

Whatever it takes eh. The point is not only are you doing the game a disservice playing that pathetic ultraflooding stuff, but ultimately you will never ever be successful. At least your regional colleagues, Port, play a more entertaining brand of footy.

When was your last flag? I believe we've ahd more success of late than your hacks parrot

 

[parrot]

When was your last flag? ...

We have 16 flags, and are the most successful Club in the comp actually. Thanks for asking.

 

[fryingpan]

Too bad you're shit though hey.

 

[smiddaz123]

We have 16 flags, and are the most successful Club in the comp actually. Thanks for asking.

What makes Carlton more successful than Essendon?

 

[Schmick]

Richmonds list isnt too flash....

The Freo supporter who said that their lsit is better than the Hawks list has rocks in his head, Hawks have one of the best looking lists going around IMO.

 

[Thrawn]

Carlton by far. They will never get better. Terrible, terrible side.

So you're saying we won't win more than 4 games this year?

 

[TigerGlory]

I'd be ashamed if i followed Carlton, there list is atrocious.

A side built around soft, outside reciever players in the midfield. With only Stevens and Murphy that really go in hard for the ball. Zero talent in the forward 50 bar Fevola. Absolutley nothing remotley useful in the backline, and probably the worst ruck division in the league, easily. Hackland and Cloke simply do not make half decent rucks.

 

[BABYBOMBERS2007]

So you're saying we won't win more than 4 games this year?

I don't think Carlton will.

 

[Thrawn]

I don't think Carlton will.

Considering your posting history, I don't think I should take you seriously on that one.

 

[Thrawn]

Zero talent in the forward 50 bar Fevola.

Did Fisher run over your dog or something?

 

[warney7]

This poll is just asking for trouble.

But really, isn't this just another way of asking who win come last in 2008?

It all depends if you're talking currently for season '08 or if the future is all you're worried about.

Essendon, Richmond and Carlton have a lot of unproven youth, and I'm sure Tigers and Blues fans are just as hopful of their youngsters as I am of Essendon's.

For the future I think Sydney are in a bit of bother as they really haven't introduced any youth into their side. Adelaide also are looking pretty ordinary of you take out McLeod, Edwards and Goodwin in a couple of years.

But hey, that's just my opinion, so take no offence

 

[Hawkamania!]

Who are the clowns that voted for Geelong? That is just ridiculous.

 

[TigerGlory]

Did Fisher run over your dog or something?

Even if Fisher had a 100 goal + season in 2008, won the brownlow, and raised his status to "Marginally good" that leaves your forward 50 with "2" half decent forwards.

Fisher makes no difference, 1 good forward or 2 good forwards, your still lacking a quality forwardline.

 

[Thrawn]

Even if Fisher had a 100 goal + season in 2008, won the brownlow, and raised his status to "Marginally good" that leaves your forward 50 with "2" half decent forwards.

Fisher makes no difference, 1 good forward or 2 good forwards, your still lacking a quality forwardline.

But you said that we had zero talent in the forward line bar Fevola.

Fisher is a talented forward, as he has shown with his play this year. It's irrelevant if he makes a difference or not, or if he's marginally good: you said Fevola was the only one with talent. And that's just not true.

 

[Merv]

Fisher is a very talented forward and would be in most clubs starting 22

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Fremantle and Melbourne both have no top end talent after McLean and Pavlich respectively, no depth and no team chemistry.

They win my vote.

 

[mad-saint-guy]

Richmond have to take it out. Ordinary brigade of experienced players and the kids are no better than those of teams like Adelaide, Brisbane or Collingwood (who have had far more success recently).

 

[Barry Zuckercorn]

Richmond's by a fair margin.

Essendon's list is N/A as there is no midfield

 

[Cheshire Cat]

Have to be Richmond now that Carlton have Judd

 

[serbkoolie]

The Tigers have the worst list.

 

[The Night Shift]

Essendon and Fremantle.

No one switched the light on for you son, did they?