Art Vandelay_
TheBrownDog
- Oct 28, 2012
- 104,678
- 142,795
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers - Tottenham
Now I'm torn.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder what the song for Geelong would be? Something from Little River Band perhaps? Maybe something a little bit country.
Jub , would you say the first is what we need is an in game chant , down by two or three rather than the old GeeeeeeLONG
Not sure where the second fits in. No killing Cats at the Cattery
They've already got that stupid ******* cougar call after goals.
If they start singing songs, I'm done.
If they want fans to make more noise, kick more goals.
I've always thought we should hijack the Deutschland chant (and replace it with "Geelong" obviously, duh). It's simple and more involving for the fans than your classic "Geeeeeelooooong" which ever second club has their version of anyways.
For reference for what I'm talking about skip to the 39 seconds mark:
I've always thought we should hijack the Deutschland chant (and replace it with "Geelong" obviously, duh). It's simple and more involving for the fans than your classic "Geeeeeelooooong" which ever second club has their version of anyways.
For reference for what I'm talking about skip to the 39 seconds mark:
Geelong whoooo , Geelong whoooo. Its good idea looking at Soccer, the shier boredom of the sport would have been seed to these chants.
Whats the common theme here. you'll never walk alone , they will never tear us apart ?
Good way to join in on an opposition team board. At least 8. Should be 9 but with Victorian clubs selling home games interstate/overseas we're being left to fill the quota of extra games at Etihad.Sorry to interrupt the drivel, the dribble of kindy kids ... how many extra games do we taxpayers expect for our $70 mil?
Sorry to interrupt the drivel, the dribble of kindy kids ... how many extra games do we taxpayers expect for our $70 mil?
But, but that's Kwality's team. So it obviously doesn't count and cannot be used against him/her in any way.Cobber, never mind the quantity, it's the quality of games that counts.
And on a per dollar comparison basis, you'd have to get 110 more games per season at the new Perth White Elephant for the (grossly underestimated) $860 million.
I've always thought we should hijack the Deutschland chant (and replace it with "Geelong" obviously, duh). It's simple and more involving for the fans than your classic "Geeeeeelooooong" which ever second club has their version of anyways.
For reference for what I'm talking about skip to the 39 seconds mark:
Hearing this on the train to Berlin during the world cup in 2006 was nuts. Whole train was rocking
Or their polling shows that the East-West tunnel is so on the nose they're bound to get elected on the promise of scrapping it. And the savings from not going ahead with that gives them an $8 billion war chest to make lots of promises for spending elsewhere.If the state ALP are offering $70 million then that tells me they've worked out they won't win the election already. So there's no harm in making promises they won't have to keep.
Or their polling shows that the East-West tunnel is so on the nose they're bound to get elected on the promise of scrapping it. And the savings from not going ahead with that gives them an $8 billion war chest to make lots of promises for spending elsewhere.
Always find it funny when people complain about the taxpayer dollars being spent on the stadium (like Eddie McGuire). If you don't want taxpayer funds spent on sporting stadiums. Fine.But, but that's Kwality's team. So it obviously doesn't count and cannot be used against him/her in any way.
It is astounding that Eddie would mention tax payer dollars being spent for sporting teams given who paid for both the Westpac centre or whatever they are calling Olympic Park these days an the place they had to pay for athletics to move to after Collingwood kicked them outAlways find it funny when people complain about the taxpayer dollars being spent on the stadium (like Eddie McGuire). If you don't want taxpayer funds spent on sporting stadiums. Fine.
There would some who have no interest in football and would like to see the money spent elsewhere. I've got no problem with that.
What I do have a problem with is opposition football fans or personalities complaining about it. In the case on McGuire, refresh me, who paid for the stadium his beloved magpies play home games at?
It's not like we are the first stadium in Australia to receive taxpayer funds, but because we're little old sleepy hollow somehow that's not allowed.
Don't ask me to quote him on it. It was on his radio program over a year ago when the last stage was underway. Mentioned it a few times in a couple of weeks.It is astounding that Eddie would mention tax payer dollars being spent for sporting teams given who paid for both the Westpac centre or whatever they are calling Olympic Park these days an the place they had to pay for athletics to move to after Collingwood kicked them out
It will be a lot less than $8 billion by the time they pay out the contract the Libs are threatening to sign pre-election.
Don't ask me to quote him on it. It was on his radio program over a year ago when the last stage was underway. Mentioned it a few times in a couple of weeks.