I'm kinda struggling a bit with this one.I want a 100 point result.
Richmond are a walking, collective urethra.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm kinda struggling a bit with this one.I want a 100 point result.
Richmond are a walking, collective urethra.
I'm kinda struggling a bit with this one.
Is the Pope a catholic!Is Majak any realistic chance?
Or will Brad Scott be predictable with his changes again?
Jacobs or Macmillan are the only real options.If Waite is fine he comes in for Black. Turner to either rest or play in the reserves with Dumont coming in. Hansen needs to come in but not sure for who?
Jacobs or Macmillan are the only real options.
It'll be Jacobs.
If I were a gambling man I'd put money on it.
If I were a gambling man I'd put money on it.
If I were a gambling man I'd put money on it.
In all honesty I don't think that there was much between the Jacobs/Macmillan performances on Saturday. If anything Macmillan was better with the ball. Jacobs frustrates because he is close to being a very solid and dependable contributor, he just needs to polish his usage in close and stop making daft decisions.Half of the AFL playing group probably have.
Hmmm, debatable, but I am working on the logic that he has missed two weeks and coming on as the sub would be a good reintroduction. For that period I would also play him on the ball and have him just attack the contests ferociously. We want him on ball one day and I think we need to give him a taste from time to time.McDonald > Macmillan.
In all honesty I don't think that there was much between the Jacobs/Macmillan performances on Saturday. If anything Macmillan was better with the ball. Jacobs frustrates because he is close to being a very solid and dependable contributor, he just needs to polish his usage in close and stop making daft decisions.
Jacobs frustrates because he is close to being a very solid and dependable contributor, he just needs to polish his usage in close and stop making daft decisions.
Hmmm, debatable, but I am working on the logic that he has missed two weeks and coming on as the sub would be a good reintroduction. For that period I would also play him on the ball and have him just attack the contests ferociously. We want him on ball one day and I think we need to give him a taste from time to time.
Colossal.Jacobs' bad decisions stand out because they are such basic **** ups.
And fair enough, but I reckon LMac would have a better impact (and for reasons stated above).I'd rather have him play and Macmillan the sub.
Indeed.<create_template>
<replace_[jacobs]_with_[insert_nmfc_footballer]>
Because he's one of the few that seems to give a s***, excuse my flemish.Indeed.
But for Jacobs' to stand out amongst that group is saying something.
B: Hansen - Tarrant - Firitto
HB: Wright - Thompson - Macmillan
C: Bastinac - Cunnington - Wood
HF: Harvey - Brown - Higgins
F: Thomas - Petrie - Waite
R: Goldstein - Swallow - Ziebell
Int: Dumont - Gibson - Nahas
Sub: McDonald
In: Hansen - Dumont - McDonald - Waite
Out: Black - Jacobs - Atley - Turner
Effectively it is Hansen for Jacobs because I cannot see Macmillan getting dropped. That's the only rationale I can use that makes sense. Hansen will play smallish/medium and peel off in front of Reiwoldt. Christ we have missed him.
Waite in for Black if he is right to go. If not, geez, I'd be tempted to go with Daw but Black should get another opportunity after having to deal with that service on Saturday night.
Turner could do with a rest and a few games in the twos, and with Dumont needing game time at AFL level I think it a good swap. One young talent for another.
I am as doubtful that Atley will be dropped as Macmillan will be dropped but his form has been as horrid as I have ever seen it. He needs to go play on ball in the magoos for a while and learn how to do the hard things well and execute under perceived pressure. Luke to come in for him and run as the sub.