Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looked like he made more contact with the shoulder to me, but still could have been avoided.
Looked like he made more contact with the shoulder to me, but still could have been avoided.
Probably a week, Dangerous act and got him high, could have been avoided.
No malice so I'll say a week.
Btw if we didn't all love him and this was Johnson/Lewis, how many would he get?
Should be similar to Fyfe, 1 week at the absolute most. Hopefully just a fine.
I think he has escaped even that. Bizarre
Good decision. Was pretty innocent in the end by on cm's from a 4 weeker so a fine is the right message to send.
Actually I think a week would be correct, it is the exact type of incident that leads to serious neck injuries even though it wasn't malicious.
I'll compare it to May, May was unlucky to have knocked him out but it was a bump that needs to be made.
Cameron's wasn't but because there was no injury he gets off - that's rubbish!
One act is far worse than the other.
Then there is Hodge who 'could've caused an injury' This wasn't used for Cameron.
My question is, should the match review panel look at the damage done or the potential for damage done? Both cases had similar damage done but I feel Cameron's had the potential to be worse. So why does he get a fine and Deledio gets a week? Both players had the choice to do something different too.
So what do you think then?I feel it best you direct that to a Hawthorn supporter.
So what do you think then?
I actually agree that the MRP should judge on the potential to cause damage, not just the damage itself. But the Hawthorn incidents were the wrong ones to use that reasoning.Both Hodge & Lewis got heavier penalties based upon the potential to do more damage.
At this point they are the only two incidents the MRP has adjudicated did not do the maximum possible damage.
Maybe a slight bitterness on the topic from us always fair and level headed Hawthorn supporters
I actually agree that the MRP should judge on the potential to cause damage, not just the damage itself. But the Hawthorn incidents were the wrong ones to use that reasoning.