Of course, O'Keefe never actually looks threateninghe did not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course, O'Keefe never actually looks threateninghe did not.
Why didn't Clarke refer the second one? Don't the challenges reset after 90 overs?
Why didn't Clarke refer the second one? Don't the challenges reset after 90 overs?
Lyon decides to turn up for the last over of the day
Seriously this 'umpires call' s**t is ridiculous, the ball either was going on to hit the stumps or it wasn't.
80 oversWhy didn't Clarke refer the second one? Don't the challenges reset after 90 overs?
The umpire's call is sensible and makes perfect sense. What is s**t is people's understanding of why it is in place.
Until it happens to someone else other than an Australian right?I don't think you should lose a review on umpires call
I think assuming they bowl 90 overs, Pakistan should score 220 today.
I don't think you should lose a review on umpires call
I don't think you should lose a review on umpires call
Like a third seamer should and All Rounder shouldFor those who watched, how did Mitch M bowl?
he's not a first class spinner, in fact he's crap and O'Keefe looks shyte as wellOnly took a day of cricket for the Lyon bashers to come out of hiding.
He must do better on day two. He has been in the side long enough to do better. This is where we need him to perform more than anywhere else and to barely threaten the batsmen all day and be easier to get away than any other bowler is very disappointing.Only took a day of cricket for the Lyon bashers to come out of hiding.
The umpire's call is sensible and makes perfect sense. What is s**t is people's understanding of why it is in place.
Not poorly, wasn't overly dangerous but was tight and kept hitting that spot.For those who watched, how did Mitch M bowl?