Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
They cut Austin Pettis, so no, they're not smartIf the Rams were smart they'd have traded for Glennon already and released Bradford.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They cut Austin Pettis, so no, they're not smartIf the Rams were smart they'd have traded for Glennon already and released Bradford.
We made a Super Bowl and lost an incredible game to thee ventual Super Bowl winners the year beforeSays more about Denver if they put the $ first.
True. They'll keep investing picks into defensive studs a la Texans but still fail to make any playoff noise. It's very very hard to follow the blueprint of winning a Lombardi by building an all-time defense. Can take years and years and still not get you anywhere. The better blueprint is a franchise qb.They cut Austin Pettis, so no, they're not smart
We get it, everyone should trade for Glennon and then win infinite Superbowls.If the Rams were smart they'd have traded for Glennon already and released Bradford.
Didn't say it'd win super bowls. Just that broncos are not going to ever win a super bowl with Manning. So why waste 18 million a year to NOT win a super bowl, when you could still NOT win a Super bowl paying 1 million to Glennon.We get it, everyone should trade for Glennon and then win infinite Superbowls.
I wonder if you'd have had that attitude in 2010. Manning made you relevant for the first time in 15 years.We made a Super Bowl and lost an incredible game to thee ventual Super Bowl winners the year before
I would prefer to be relevant than a basket case.
I think the coaching was a big culprit so interesting to see how we go this year. Manning was injured and at the end of the day we will still have Elway
You can also NOT win a Super Bowl by playing 99% of QB's. I'm still not sure what your point is…Didn't say it'd win super bowls. Just that broncos are not going to ever win a super bowl with Manning. So why waste 18 million a year to NOT win a super bowl, when you could still NOT win a Super bowl paying 1 million to Glennon.
Would you rather Glennon or Carr at Oakland?Didn't say it'd win super bowls. Just that broncos are not going to ever win a super bowl with Manning. So why waste 18 million a year to NOT win a super bowl, when you could still NOT win a Super bowl paying 1 million to Glennon.
Would I prefer to be a basket case or relevant? Really?I wonder if you'd have had that attitude in 2010. Manning made you relevant for the first time in 15 years.
Ooooh that's a nasty question. Personally I like Glennon a little better than Carr. But I think both are headed upwards. And that's not even taking into account Glennon's good looks.Would you rather Glennon or Carr at Oakland?
I'm not sure what your post even means.You can also NOT win a Super Bowl by playing 99% of QB's. I'm still not sure what your point is…
I agree. Watching him throw punts to Patriots Defensive Backs is rather enjoyable.Superbowl or no Superbowl, what Manning brings to the table is worth the $$
39 TDs in 2014 is like 24 TDs in 2004.39 TDs is s**t now?
Thats about the norm now isn't it. Did 39 and 55 the year before amount to a Lombardi? How many did Russell Wilson throw in 2013 and how many did Brady throw in 2014.39 TDs is s**t now?
So you'd rather destroy your future just so people watch you now, than actually build a potential dynasty?Would I prefer to be a basket case or relevant? Really?
Potential dynastySo you'd rather destroy your future just so people watch you now, than actually build a potential dynasty?
That'd be like a Colts fan in 2012 saying they'd rather have Manning than Luck.
Let me educate youI'm not sure what your post even means.
Manning won't win the Broncos a super bowl. So why waste another 18m on him, especially with him now really heading downwards physically, and his play too.
I'm not sure what your post even means.
Manning won't win the Broncos a super bowl. So why waste another 18m on him, especially with him now really heading downwards physically, and his play too.
1 protects the ball, the other can't.Let me educate you
Over the second half of the season:
15TDs, 10 INTs, 2155 yds, 187/288 - 65%
11 TDs, 6 INTs, 1717 yds, 159/248 - 64%
One of these is Super Bowl winning QB Tom Brady, the other is washed up, injured (basically worthless piece of s**t) Peyton Manning
The Colts aren't going anywhere with Ryan Grigson as their GM. **** on a bull are more useful than Grigson.Potential dynasty
Do you know how hard that is?
Your team is treading water. I would prefer to bottom out (like the 2012 colts)
My point is they got a franchise QB by bottoming outThe Colts aren't going anywhere with Ryan Grigson as their GM. **** on a bull are more useful than Grigson.
1 is injured, the other isn't.1 protects the ball, the other can't.
True.1 is injured, the other isn't.
I didn't realise I was Peyton Manning making excuses for myself rightTrue.
Manning makes excuses.
Brady just shuts up and doesn't let the fact he's been on the injury list every week for about 10 years effect him.