Won't rest till I've seen he's signed.
Yep, l want it done also. Have a feeling he's almost going to be unstoppable this year and the longer it goes on the more money is going to be thrown at him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Won't rest till I've seen he's signed.
Didn't North continue to pay out part of Hamish's contract, Partridge?Which you could argue, they've already done by bringing in McIntosh.
See my post above, 10lana ^^I was under the impression that his contract is quite modest and front loaded. 3 years 1 million in total. Half it paid in the first year.
Not if North paid it.500 for zero games. Hardly a bargain.
250 & 250 , that would be value if he plays 10 games imo. So value last year , this year we will see. 250 a year is really backup money isn't hardly #1 ruck money.
There have been multiple rumours, all positive and plenty of past players apparently in the "know", who've said it's all over bar the shouting, ypo. I'm more confident on this one than I was on GAJ's. In that case, I was trying to convince myself he was going to sign but I never really believed it. Tomahawk just seems to be so up front- no deception- what you see is what you get.Won't rest till I've seen he's signed.
Can stop talking about Steven now at least, had signed until the end of 2020 I just read on twitter.
EDIT : beat me to it CE
Nah, there's only one of them.But what about Stevens?
Motlop...Nah, there's only one of them.
Would most of us on here label or term murdoch as under performed,under developed or both ? Or a slow developer not demanding enough to go that lil bit closer to the edge to push himself.....or lazy ? If he needs the MC and playing group to push him, we're in trouble!
Not if North paid it.
I'll see if I can hunt up more info on that
Truth be told Turbo, I think Scooter and Steven are plans B and C behind PD. I doubt we will be bidding for either if PD is in the bag. I think the cash will be spent retaining Motlop and Hawk and whatever is left over on a ruckman.
I hope he takes it on, that he has to work harder now that we have some leg speed choices or growthWould say none of those. he has probably had more games than he was due , more because we lack other with speed. Now we are starting to get some speed he may have to work harder to stay best 22.
I'm sure we are looking at all sorts of backup and other options. You know my view though that a mature ruckman is a bigger trade priority than a defender.So if plan be C is done , I guess we start to nose around for plan D.
Id like to have look at some of those defenders up there at GWS , must have couple extras up there. Not FA's of course but a 22-24 year old defender that has not been injured for two years would be handy.
Yeah- sorry- I skimmed a couple of pages of relevant articles but they weren't helpful. Or none of them stated that North were kicking in a few bucks, which is what I was hunting for.They may have chipped in , depends on how much his backended contrat was.
We already have plan D on our list.
We already have plan D on our list.
How do you figure that 10lana?
See post number 118.
... I meant Delaney, you know the key defender that is on our list
Gone early there.Oh...you meant D for dud,now I follow!
D for Delaney OK.... just that when I mentioned Plan D then followed up with the criteria that someone that hasn't been injured two years..... I thought this would have been a tell on Delaney , like so many we have recruited recently have been walking wounded.
Yes if he come good he is what im sort of looking for. 22.9 yo , at 194cm a fraction taller than what I was thinking on , and already having played 6 games. ..not a bad plan D I guess.
Oh...you meant D for dud,now I follow!
Gone early there.