The King!
Chosen One
100 % Agree , Shaw sub and move Biggs up to the wing. ill be spewing if they mess with Rohans form
yup
Mitchell cant be sub either, if he isn't fully fit he can sub off but he is not an impact player imho
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
100 % Agree , Shaw sub and move Biggs up to the wing. ill be spewing if they mess with Rohans form
Centre squareyup
Mitchell cant be sub either, if he isn't fully fit he can sub off but he is not an impact player imho
A couple of points from the last game, copied and pasted not my work..Game is looming like a clash of interesting strengths and weaknesses. We are down three of our five highest clearance winners (per game) in Kennedy, Bird and McGlynn which would give the 5th highest clearance winning Dogs some confidence but they are without their best ruckman, although he was dropped rather than missing through injury.
With that said, our defence has always been very comfortable when conceding plenty of clearances and inside 50's and we have 9 defenders in the side as it stands who can all comfortably play down back (plus McVeigh). The Dogs forward line is hardly the most imposing in the league but Bontempelli, Stringer, Dahlhaus and Crameri are good enough to cause some headaches.
If we can get enough ball into our forward 50, I'd back our forwards to kick a pretty strong score against the Dogs' defence. If the Dogs can win far, far more ball out of the midfield against our understrength midfield, it could get very interesting. They would have to win overwhelmingly more ball than our midfield would to go close I think.