Dean Ambrose has the obvious potential to be the main event badass baby face that the WWE needs, but at the same time, I'm sure he could be a cracking heel as well.
Fastlane (2016)
- Thread starter Bomberboyokay
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Mar 11, 2012
- 5,173
- 7,945
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Patriots & UConn
Ambrose at least would bring an element of surprise and then uncertainty to the whole affair. We'd be surprised that he won the triple threat, and then we wouldn't be sure if he was going over at WM.
Elgin would give it a go ;-)
I think they have changed their mind and will have Lesnar win. Dumb and stubborn as the WWE are these days I think they can see the car crash the lead in to WMania would be with Reigns as face again and will avoid it.
They've been trying to recreate the Austin vs McMahon anti-hero gold of the Attitude Era but with the completely wrong guy. Ambrose would be perfect for it. He's mega over and could play the anti-authority bad ass tweener role to perfection.
If there's concern over him being the "face of the company" then just dial back the crazy a tiny bit.
If there's concern over him being the "face of the company" then just dial back the crazy a tiny bit.
TooUglyForFugly
Brownlow Medallist
- Aug 15, 2009
- 21,235
- 12,395
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Biggest problem is "WWE's underdog" doesn't work when the dumb bastard has the EC3 streak of never submitting or being pinned. And none - NONE - of the personality.
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Ambrose is not even in the same League as being Over as Austin was. The one you would do it with would be Daniel Bryan
Never said he was. But he's the closest they've got.
TradeDraft
Post-Human
and That is why they should not being doing this at the Moment. Don't have the Talent to pull it off
- Aug 18, 2009
- 7,234
- 6,736
- AFL Club
- Richmond
You can argue over Roman or Ambrose or whatever you like, it really doesn't matter because in the end we'll still be getting the same boring face v authority angle that they've done non stop since 2012. It was good with punk, it's been terrible every other time. Can't wait to see Ambrose or Reigns face Kane at extreme rules.
Last edited:
TradeDraft
Post-Human
You think the Bryan one sucked for WM30?
- Aug 18, 2009
- 7,234
- 6,736
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Yep, it was super unrealistic and they dedicated the entire show to Bryan's obvious predictable win. The build was terrible, that 'occupy Raw' bullshit was so cringeworthy.
Undertaker should've main evented that show. Not Triple H's whacky authority antics
TradeDraft
Post-Human
What Guy? There is no one except Reigns at that Level Yet or They are out Injured
The guy I mentioned 10 posts ago.
TooUglyForFugly
Brownlow Medallist
- Aug 15, 2009
- 21,235
- 12,395
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Fixed. There are 'no other guys' because the E doesn't give enough of a s**t to put them on the same level. Or a rung below at the worst.
TradeDraft
Post-Human
What about Orton Then?
timtamWB
Resident Biscuit
Do you really want to see Orton vs the Authority again?
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Not Really but he is at that Level that he could Kill The Authority Off. Though you never really seen him get back at them after WM 30
AmellyPies
Club Legend
- Nov 2, 2015
- 2,431
- 2,026
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #70
Yeah I like this idea, Ambrose stuff with Rollins was really good. Similar character to Austin in some ways.
Cleavy
Hall of Famer
TradeDraft
Post-Human
I see Ambrose almost the Same as Brian Pillman
AmellyPies
Club Legend
- Nov 2, 2015
- 2,431
- 2,026
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #73
God bloody dam it. Right in the feels.
TradeDraft
Post-Human
- Sep 27, 2014
- 34,227
- 28,859
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Thread starter
- #75
The Authority may die but, for better or worse, we'll be seeing Triple H and Stephanie McMahon for many years to come.
