Power is the worst.
should just be PAFC.
should just be PAFC.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This will never happen in the modern day though, where the public and consumers' views on a particular product are primarily formed by the branding around it.I actually respect Gold Coast's initial decision not to adopt a moniker, obviously that went out the door, but I think it should be the way to go for future expansion clubs, an identity developing over time would help them feel like a club, more than a franchise.
And while I have no problems with Gold Coast or GWS, they definitely don't feel like clubs.
EFAWe are the Sharks of the Gold Coast sea
We are the Sharks of the Gold Coast sky...
I can't imagine a parochially masculine sport allowing "Angels"... unfortunately it's not "macho" enough.i could also see Gold Coast Angels as on option instead of Sharks. It works, but probably just for me.
Why?i could also see Gold Coast Angels as on option instead of Sharks. It works, but probably just for me.
I can't imagine a parochially masculine sport allowing "Angels"... unfortunately it's not "macho" enough.
Los Angeles Angels of AnaheimI can't imagine a parochially masculine sport allowing "Angels"... unfortunately it's not "macho" enough.
Not really sure, it came about when I created my own league for Australia and used the Angels nickname for GC. Since then, I've never had a problem with it.Why?
I personally don't have a problem with it. I follow a team called the Rabbitohs so I know teams don't have to have striking-macho-big-balls nicknames. But they obviously didn't want to go with something (potentially) relatively effeminate.Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
Not really sure, it came about when I created my own league for Australia and used the Angels nickname for GC. Since then, I've never had a problem with it.
There was a competition held in 1914 whe Hawthorn were joining the VFA.
They were told they could not wear Blue & Gold, their colours, so they had to find an alternative. (Williamstown were already Blue & Gold)
Apparently there were over a dozen entries, and Brown and Gold won the competition because no other clubs wore Brown.
I have never found anything saying who proposed it, or how it was voted on, just that that combination won the competition.
Adding options 2 and 3 below to this thread as proposed jumpers that will never see the light of day, option 1 will be worn by the Dogs in round 6 this year (unfortunately). They all stink.
I personally don't have a problem with it. I follow a team called the Rabbitohs so I know teams don't have to have striking-macho-big-balls nicknames. But they obviously didn't want to go with something (potentially) relatively effeminate.
My junior club was the Sharks, thought we looked pretty good. Couldn't find many good pictures, but if you fixed the cuffs, and took away the 'SHARKS' at the back it would look awesome IMOThe league still needs Sharks.
inb4tripanelisshitmy old club Hillside Sharks always had the best jumper in the league IMO, no bias though...