Our W/L record against all teams

[estibador]

Not a bad start for a new team, and would constitute a "streak" for us.

If I'm not mistaken it was our longest winning 'streak' until CC came along and won 5 straight early in 2003.

Pretty sad that it took us over 8 seasons to win more than 2 in a row.

 

[Kram]

I came here to amuse myself with Freo's pathetic win/loss ratio...

I like Hawthorn's win/loss ratio in 2010.

 

[Sandi2Palmer]

I like Hawthorn's win/loss ratio in 2010.

From memory the Hawks joined in 1925 and how long did it take them to get a flag?

 

[Borry]

From memory the Hawks joined in 1925 and how long did it take them to get a flag?

Hawthorn made the finals for the first time in 1957. So took them one hell of a long time to just make the finals since joining the comp.
http://www.stats.rleague.com/afl/teams/hawthorn/season.html

 

[Purple_Passion]

As of round 9:

Carlton - 12-10 = 54.5%
Melbourne - 13-12 = 52%

Saints - 11-12 = 47.8% (Before 50%)
Sydney - 10-12 = 45.5% (Before 42.8%)
Richmond - 10-13 = 43.5% (Before 40.9%)
eagles - 13-18 = 41.9% (Before 40%)
Adelaide - 10-15 = 40% (Before 37.5%)

Collingwood - 8-13 = 38.1% (Before 40%)
Dogs - 7-12 = 36.8%
Brisbane - 6-11 = 35.3% (Before 31.2%)
Essendon - 8-16 = 33.3% (Before 30.4%)
Port - 7-14 = 33.3%

North - 5-12 = 29.4%
Hawthorn - 6-15 = 28.5%
Geelong - 7-18 = 28% (Before 25%)

 

[PapaJ]

Hawthorn made the finals for the first time in 1957. So took them one hell of a long time to just make the finals since joining the comp.
http://www.stats.rleague.com/afl/teams/hawthorn/season.html

It was a different era then - there wasn't the 'equalisation' systems in place that the AFL have these days. But yes it was a poor first few decades for the Hawks, their first 15 years had something like 4 wooden spoons and a w-l ratio of something like 30%, probably less.

 

[sansian]

Nice bit of green there Esti.

Hopefully 2 and a bit seasons will see us go on the right side of 50% against the wiggles.

 

[estibador]

*Update time*

It's looking a little healthier now with Geelong the only team left in the under 30% group.




Carlton - 14-10 = 58.3% (+3.8%)
Melbourne - 14-12 = 53.8% (+1.8%)

Saints - 11-13 = 45.8% (-4.2%)
eagles - 14-18 = 43.7% (+3.7%)
Sydney - 10-13 = 43.4% (+0.6%)
Richmond - 10-14 = 41.6% (+0.7%)

Adelaide - 10-16 = 38.4% (+0.9%)
Collingwood - 8-13 = 38% (-2%)
Port - 8-14 = 36.3% (+3%)
Brisbane - 6-11 = 35.2% (+4%)
Dogs - 7-13 = 33.3% (-3.5%)
Essendon - 8-16 = 33.3% (+2.9%)
North - 6-13 = 31.5% (+2.1%)
Hawthorn - 7-16 = 30.4% (+1.9%)

Geelong - 7-19 = 26.9% (+1.9%)





- Only 3 teams we didn't beat this year - Saints, Pies and Dogs

- Carlton have further entrenched themselves as our numero uno bitches

- Our modern day bitches from across the river have jumped up 2 spots. Surely it's just a matter of time before they take up their rightful place in the top group

 

[Nickos66]

Nice one. Lets improve these stats with an undefeated season next year.

Any idea what Harvey's win/loss stats & % were pre & post 2010? wouldn't mind knowing how much that improved. I remember him & Dean Bailey had the worst win/loss ratios in the league for coaches at some stage.

 

[estibador]

Any idea what Harvey's win/loss stats & % were pre & post 2010? wouldn't mind knowing how much that improved. I remember him & Dean Bailey had the worst win/loss ratios in the league for coaches at some stage.

Including the games he was caretaker for in 07:

Pre-2010 - 16-35 = 31.3%

Post-2010 - 30-45 = 40%

 

[Nickos66]

Hah! Almost doubling his winnings in 1 year. Hopefully it's a sign of things to come.

Cheers for that too, Esti.

 

[estibador]

*Update time*

Not going to be pretty I'm guessing. Expecting to see a lot of red ink.



Gold Coast - 1-0 = 100%

Carlton - 14-11 = 56% (-2.3%)
Melbourne - 14-13 = 51.8% (-2%)

Sydney - 11-13 = 45.8% (+2.4%)
Saints - 11-15 = 42.3% (-3.5%)
Brisbane - 8-11 = 42.1% (+6.9%)
eagles - 14-20 = 41.2% (-2.5%)
Adelaide - 11-16 = 40.7% (+2.3%)
Richmond - 10-15 = 40% (-1.6%)

Port - 9-14 = 39.1% (+2.8%)
Collingwood - 8-14 = 36.4% (-1.6%)
Dogs - 8-14 = 36.3% (+3%)
Essendon - 9-16 = 36% (+2.7%)
North - 7-14 = 33.3% (+1.8%)

Hawthorn - 7-18 = 28% (-2.4%)
Geelong - 7-20 = 25.9% (-1%)



- woohoo we have a new temporary bitch in GC

- Adelaide have moved up into the 40%+ group

- Brisbane are the biggest movers, jumping up 5 spots into the 40%+ group

- Hawthorn have dropped back into the bottom group

- Our 40% winning record against Richmond is pretty disgraceful considering how crap they've been for our whole existence



Games played against each club:

eagles - 34
Adelaide - 27
Melbourne - 27
Geelong - 27
Saints - 26
Richmond - 25
Carlton - 25
Essendon - 25
Hawthorn - 25
Sydney - 24
Port - 23
Collingwood - 22
Dogs - 22
North - 21
Brisbane - 19
GC - 1


North must be scared of us - we've only played them twice 4 out of 17 years

 

[Patty_Moz]

If you looked at the fixture at the start of the year and saw that you got to play the dockers twice you would have to be pretty happy one could pencil in at least one and a good chance of two wins. Out of the teams we played twice Saints/Hawks/Eagles all beat us twice, 1-1 with North/Bulldogs and we beat Brisbane both times. 4-8 record against teams we play twice pretty dismal.

 

[Forey Johnson]

I can't remember being beaten by Fremantle in Melbourne, but we have some serious trouble and difficulty defeating your boys in Perth. Still slightly surprised by the win/loss record.

Last year? round 2 at Etihad stadium


oh and

Gold Coast - 1-0 = 100%

 

[wild side]

I did the research for this for a thread on the main board and figured I might as well post it here as well for interests sake:

Carlton - 12-10 = 54.5%
Melbourne - 13-12 = 52%

Saints - 11-11 = 50%

Sydney - 9-12 = 42.8%
Richmond - 9-13 = 40.9%
eagles - 12-18 = 40%
Collingwood - 8-12 = 40%

Adelaide - 9-15 = 37.5%
Dogs - 7-12 = 36.8%
Port - 7-14 = 33.3%
Brisbane - 5-11 = 31.2%
Essendon - 7-16 = 30.4%

North - 5-12 = 29.4%
Hawthorn - 6-15 = 28.5%
Geelong - 6-18 = 25%

A few things that surprised me:

- we have a positive record against Mebourne when I thought Carlton where the only team we could say that about

- I thought our record against Sydney would be a lot worse. Forgot that we actually had a good winning streak going against them in our early days. They were our original bunnies back then

- We've only played North 17 times in 15 years. I guess the AFL is worried they will go bankrupt if they have to host us in front of 200 of their fans too often.

Just shows how s**t we have been for 17 years! But I already knew that!

 

[estibador]

Last year? round 2 at Etihad stadium

Look at the date of his post.

 

[Borry]

Our records against Richmond, Melbourne and St Kilda under Harvey have been very concerning to say the least.

 

[estibador]

*Update time - end of 2012*

Looking pretty good this year, lots of green.



Gold Coast - 2-0 = 100%
GWS - 1-0 = 100%

Melbourne - 16-13 = 55.2% (+3.4%)
Carlton - 14-12 = 53.8% (-2.2%)

Brisbane - 9-11 = 45% (+2.9%)
Saints - 12-15 = 44.4% (+2.1%)
Richmond - 12-15 = 44.4% (+4.4%)
Sydney - 11-14 = 44% (-1.8%)
Port - 11-14 = 44% (+4.9%)
eagles - 15-21 = 41.6% (+0.4%)

Dogs - 9-14 = 39.1% (+2.8%)
Adelaide - 11-19 = 36.7% (-4%)
North - 8-14 = 36.4% (+3.1%)
Collingwood - 8-15 = 34.8% (-1.6%)
Essendon - 9-17 = 34.6% (-1.4%)
Geelong - 9-20 = 31% (+5.1%)

Hawthorn - 7-19 = 26.9% (-1.1%)


- Melbourne jump ahead of Carlton as our number 1 non-expansion bitch

- Richmond, Port and Geelong big movers up with 2 wins against each. Geelong finally move out of the bottom group

- Adelaide big movers down with 3 losses giving a big hit to our winning percentage

- Hawthorn take over from Geelong as our number 1 bogey team





Games played against each club:

eagles - 36
Adelaide - 30
Melbourne - 29
Geelong - 29
Saints - 27
Richmond - 27
Carlton - 26
Essendon - 26
Hawthorn - 26
Sydney - 25
Port - 25
Collingwood - 23
Dogs - 23
North - 22
Brisbane - 20
GC - 2
GWS - 1

 

[Wee Jessies]

Just thought I would post current players win/loss ratios. Considering there is so many teams where we bat less than 50% there are some pretty encouraging numbers. Pav is currently 23rd.

Check out Roberton vs Suban and Clarke. He was very good this year I hope we don't lose him.

Player Games Wins Win%
Spurr, Lee 13 10 76.9%
Dawson, Zac 18 11 61.1%
Morabito, Anthony 23 14 60.9%
Roberton, Dylan 37 22 59.5%
Walters, Michael 21 12 57.1%
Ballantyne, Hayden 65 37 56.9%
Fyfe, Nathan 50 28 56.0%
Griffin, Jonathon 20 11 55.0%
Barlow, Michael 46 25 54.3%
Sandilands, Aaron 183 93 50.8%
Mayne, Chris 81 41 50.6%
Crowley, Ryan 139 70 50.4%
Johnson, Michael 149 75 50.3%
de Boer, Matthew 76 38 50.0%
Mzungu, Tendai 38 19 50.0%
Hill, Stephen 89 44 49.4%
Mundy, David 164 81 49.4%
McPhee, Adam 81 40 49.4%
McPharlin, Luke 197 97 49.2%
Silvagni, Alex 29 14 48.3%
Duffield, Paul 111 52 46.8%
Pearce, Clancee 50 23 46.0%
Pavlich, Matthew 279 126 45.2%
Bradley, Kepler 63 28 44.4%
Ibbotson, Garrick 102 44 43.1%
Broughton, Greg 68 29 42.6%
Suban, Nick 62 26 41.9%
Lower, Nick 22 9 40.9%
Pitt, Jayden 10 4 40.0%
Neale, Lachie 11 4 36.4%
Crichton, Jesse 17 6 35.3%
Clarke, Zac 36 12 33.3%
Anthony, John 8 1 12.5%

 

[estibador]

Player Games Wins Win%
Spurr, Lee 13 10 76.9%

Now you guys see why I took him in the buddy draft - I know a winner when I see one.

 

[Kram]

Jack Anthony.

Delist.

 

[estibador]

Anthony, John 8 1 12.5%

Poor fella, seems like everything he touches turns to s**t.

 

[Clay Davis]

I wonder where Zac Dawson sits in the all time Freo win-loss record stakes?

Take out players that have played less than five games - would he be top 10?

 

[Andy Brennan]

According to those stats if we pick Jack Anthony every week we will win 2.75 games a year...

 

[Wee Jessies]

I wonder where Zac Dawson sits in the all time Freo win-loss record stakes?

Take out players that have played less than five games - would he be top 10?

Easily, I had a very quick scan and the only ex-players I could see with more than 50% were

Roger (53.1%) amazing considering the era he played in.
Croad (52.6%)
Ryan Murphy (52.1%) maybe we should have cut him more slack
Headland (50.9%)
Medhurst (50.5%)
Simmonds (50%)