SC 2016 - My Team (Pre-NAB Challenge)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
cdcanman said:
Pretty solid.
Love the Gawn pick. Should be a great R2.
If you are comfortable that Wells is going to be a viable option, have you considered taking one less premo forward (likely Tippett or Buddy) in order to add an extra defender? Chances are Kerridge and Brown will both score ok early, better chance of doing so than the defender rooks IMO. Might be better off having those 2 on the field, turning Tippett/Buddy into another premo/sub-premo defender and therefore eliminating one lower scoring rookie defender.
Food for thought
Click to expand...
thanks bud. good thoughts. bit to ponder. appreciate it.
 
Judd2Sewell said:
Love Breust. I really think he could become an elite midfielder if he was given a permanent role - he's so clean in possession, tackles hard, is great in the air for his size and wins contested possessions.

However I was expecting this transition to happen this season just gone, but he's obviously one of the best small/medium forwards in the league so he offers more value up forward for now.

Though with the reduction in interchanges there will be many more rotations through the middle, especially with our aging stars. So I expect he'll get more time in the centre.

Cheers for the heads-up on Freeman.
Click to expand...
I thought that might happen too. Last NAB as i recall he saw a fair bit of mid time.
 
Judd2Sewell said:
Cheers man.

Goldy is too expensive ATM, I'm hoping he'll have a down game or two and then I can pounce on him... So really I'm just rolling the dice.
Click to expand...
"My what big dice you have" said Goldylocks.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

joop said:
Small variation for Team number 3. Unless there is injuries these are the promos I'll run with. May downgrade Gresham and/or Kerridge to get playing rookies in. I have **** all cash left but I expect to start strong.

View attachment 214419
Click to expand...
Very nice mate, 15 keepers if your lucky :thumbsu:

Don't like the Zorko pick, prefer Wingard/Barlow

Also reasons why you don't have Fyfe or Lids?

Nice overall team, I don't mind the overspending in the backline, but would prefer a more stock standard structure :thumbsu:
 
joop said:
Small variation for Team number 3. Unless there is injuries these are the promos I'll run with. May downgrade Gresham and/or Kerridge to get playing rookies in. I have **** all cash left but I expect to start strong.

View attachment 214419
Click to expand...
Good looking team. You might need a bit of luck with the cheapo rookies, but if it comes off you might be laughing. 15 keepers if all goes to plan.
 
SincMagic said:
Very nice mate, 15 keepers if your lucky :thumbsu:

Don't like the Zorko pick, prefer Wingard/Barlow

Also reasons why you don't have Fyfe or Lids?

Nice overall team, I don't mind the overspending in the backline, but would prefer a more stock standard structure :thumbsu:
Click to expand...
Zorko & Wingard have both played 4 years, zorkos lowest average being 86. He's had 1 year at 99 and 2 years at 100.
Wingard has had a year at 97 & a year at 98 with the other 2 years irrelevant.
I can't see where Wingard is going to get extra points from last year. He kicked over 50 goals and averaged nearly 20 possessions a game. I think that's about what he'll stay at so for me I'd rather Zorko.
Won't be touching Barlow, I think Freo will slide a little bit this year and he'll be the first one to make way for Weller/Blakely/Langdon.
Would love to have Fyfe & Deledio but you can't have everyone. Hopefully they'll be my first 2 players traded in.
 
joop said:
Won't be touching Barlow, I think Freo will slide a little bit this year and he'll be the first one to make way for Weller/Blakely/Langdon.
Click to expand...
Freo finished on top of the ladder and made a prelim, so if they slide they'll make the eight at worst.

Why would a side in the mix for finals and aiming for a top 4 berth drop a 28-year-old 113-game midfielder to gift games to a couple of teenagers?
 
joop said:
Zorko & Wingard have both played 4 years, zorkos lowest average being 86. He's had 1 year at 99 and 2 years at 100.
Wingard has had a year at 97 & a year at 98 with the other 2 years irrelevant.
I can't see where Wingard is going to get extra points from last year. He kicked over 50 goals and averaged nearly 20 possessions a game. I think that's about what he'll stay at so for me I'd rather Zorko.
Won't be touching Barlow, I think Freo will slide a little bit this year and he'll be the first one to make way for Weller/Blakely/Langdon.
Would love to have Fyfe & Deledio but you can't have everyone. Hopefully they'll be my first 2 players traded in.
Click to expand...

Zorko is an interesting one. If I recall correctly his average before the bye last year was about 82, and he was around $430,000.

He finished the year very strongly, but it's worth noting that Beams didn't play during most of that time. My concern with Zorko is that with Beams back and a fit list, Zorko will see less mid time & go back to playing more of that forward flank role like he did before the bye.
 
Feerits Elf said:
Freo finished on top of the ladder and made a prelim, so if they slide they'll make the eight at worst.

Why would a side in the mix for finals and aiming for a top 4 berth drop a 28-year-old 113-game midfielder to gift games to a couple of teenagers?
Click to expand...
No idea what relevance them making a prelim has to them sliding?
Barlow looked a lot slower last year, hence being subbed a couple of times. I expect that to continue.

DraftPunk said:
Zorko is an interesting one. If I recall correctly his average before the bye last year was about 82, and he was around $430,000.

He finished the year very strongly, but it's worth noting that Beams didn't play during most of that time. My concern with Zorko is that with Beams back and a fit list, Zorko will see less mid time & go back to playing more of that forward flank role like he did before the bye.
Click to expand...

Maybe so, but he still averaged 100 and has done it in previous years. Can't see his scores being totally dependant on one player.
 
DraftPunk said:
Zorko is an interesting one. If I recall correctly his average before the bye last year was about 82, and he was around $430,000.

He finished the year very strongly, but it's worth noting that Beams didn't play during most of that time. My concern with Zorko is that with Beams back and a fit list, Zorko will see less mid time & go back to playing more of that forward flank role like he did before the bye.
Click to expand...

No Redden or Aish this year. I'm expecting zorko at quite a few ball ups this season.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Here is my current team - appreciate any input thanks

DEF: Houli, Yeo, Rich, B Smith, Malceski, M. Brown (M Brown, R Bonner)
MID: Danger, Ablett, Sloane, Rockliff, Wines, Griffen, Libba, B Crouch (A Francis, Petracca, Polkinghorne)
RUCK: Sinclair, Lobbe (M Cox)
FWD: Dusty, Bird, Duggan, Simpkin, B Kennedy, Cockatoo (Kerridge, Kommer)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
Teams 2024 Rate My Pre-Season Team
100 101 102 103 104
Replies
3K
Views
131K
Andrewy
Andrewy
JuddgementDay
My SC year in review 2023
Replies
4
Views
604
croweater 41
croweater 41
WaynesWorld19
Scores and rankings 2024 SC League Competitions
Replies
0
Views
996
WaynesWorld19
WaynesWorld19
blueiris
  • Locked
Teams 2023 Rate My Preseason Team
185 186 187 188 189
Replies
5K
Views
192K
Thuggee_Cult
Thuggee_Cult
SELFCONFESDAFLNERD
Teams Your Starting SC Team
2 3
Replies
55
Views
2K
rocker_oz33
rocker_oz33
gutsroy
Discussion 2024 Team value & trades left
2 3 4 5
Replies
102
Views
5K
evo
evo
WaynesWorld19
Scores and rankings 2024 BigFooty SC Group - ✨ Code - 224560 ✨
Replies
9
Views
1K
kyri
kyri

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top