- Aug 21, 2016
- 15,744
- 24,919
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Oldham
Luxury tax would be difficult.
How do you set a tax that would be sufficiently punishing for teams that can actively flaunt it without making it too harsh on others?
For example, The Yankees in the MLB pretty much don't GAF about the luxury tax and pay it every year.
Would an extra 50m a year in tax really bother certain clubs?
Take a step back. The original intent of the financial regulations was to prevent clubs overspending and going insolvent, owing millions to their creditors. It has morphed into equalisation and punishing teams that don't conform, even when they are at no financial risk.
United and City's stance is that there should be no hard salary cap in the Premier League as it would put English clubs at a disadvantage to the rest of Europe.