Umpiring

[tigers12]

Josh Jenkins

11

Josh Jenkins

Age

35

Ht

200cm

Wt

108kg

Pos.

F/R

Career

Season

Last 5

D

12.9

3star

K

9.1

4star

HB

3.8

3star

M

5.1

5star

T

2.4

4star

G

2.1

5star

No current season stats available

D

11.0

3star

K

7.6

3star

HB

3.4

3star

M

4.6

5star

T

1.2

3star

G

1.6

5star

mouthing off on SEN about the footage going around on Twitter of the shot on goal and he saying it was clearly a behind
Seriously is his eyes painted on ?

 

[Grrr]

I thought Lynch should have been paid a free earlier but it strangely went the other way.
That would have been a shot right in front of goal.

What do you mean strangely?

 

[Area51]

Josh Jenkins mouthing off on SEN about the footage going around on Twitter of the shot on goal and he saying it was clearly a behind
Seriously is his eyes painted on ?

Cant blame anyone for having a distorted sense of reality when it comes to the Tigers after going on that camp

 

[Greggy]

What was he on such an angle for. You could see the correct line from the position this video was taken from in a direct line from that girls head to the middle of the goals. Why was he two metres to the boundary line. I thought at the time when he marked it it was an easy drop punt, and it should have been.

Yeah that’s the issue with Andrew’s playing on, Tom never actually walked off line, he was off line to the right of the mark so he could kick over the mark.

 

[smasha]

Biggest howler was letting Andrew’s pre-emptively run over the mark, should’ve been a 50, that’s what put Lynch off his kick.

I told you the umps would use the 500 shades of grey in their decision making.

 

[smasha]

What do you mean strangely?

Got chopped out in a marking contest and the Lions player received the free.

 

[Grrr]

Got chopped out in a marking contest and the Lions player received the free.

By strangely I meant did you expect anything different. Not sure what the final us vs them count was but at one stage in the last Q it was 22 - 11.

 

[Nobby]

The AFL doesn’t have any magic cameras that only they have access to, they use the broadcasters cameras. What the broadcasters have is what the ARC has access to.

Tom Browne said the ARC vision is higher definition than what the broadcaster transmits ........

 

[Serenity_Now]

Tom Browne said the ARC vision is higher definition than what the broadcaster transmits ........

Could be the best definition known to man, not gonna help when the cameras are in the wrong spot to make that call.

 

[Nobby]

 

[Gman]

What never gets mentioned is the moment Lynch takes a step the man on the mark starts charging at him, never saw the umpire call play on...

 

[GhostofJimJess]

Show us the vision then ?? sweep it under the carpet nice and quick corrupt cheating organisation.

And in other news, Donald Trump has signed off on his own tax return as being totally above board, whilst a group of Year 9 boys from the local secondary college have signed off on their own behaviour in Miss Schnedley's Geography class this afternoon as being not rowdy at all.

 

[GhostofJimJess]

Tom Browne said the ARC vision is higher definition than what the broadcaster transmits ........

It was actually confirmed earlier in the season that it's not any more high in definition than what we see.

 

[smasha]

AFL amatuers

 

[59Stanley]

Interesting to see a recall of advantage tonight unlike the Baker one

 

[GhostofJimJess]

Interesting to see a recall of advantage tonight unlike the Baker one

Noticed that. Jackson clearly played on after the whistle went.

 

[fleabitten]

I'm still annoyed about the Baker one. Fair enough if the unp decides he played on too far to call it back (a bit harsh but ok). The easy choice is then to call it OOB but instead he actually reverses the free and then doubles down with a 50. Such a complete lack of COMMON SENSE and incredibly unjust to give the lions a free goal because Baker took a split second too long to realise there was no advantage in playing on.

 

[Area51]

Tom Browne said the ARC vision is higher definition than what the broadcaster transmits ........

I've got vision of Elvis down at 7 eleven last night too.

Where is the ******* vision?

 

[Dunger]

When Whately are Barrett agree with us, you know s**t is ****ed up.

Add Leigh Matthews, Jason Dunstall who also hate us but agree the decision was wrong.

Show us the conclusive vision

 

[Lacustrus]

I told you the umps would use the 500 shades of grey in their decision making.

Nah it’s common sense

 

[TigerTime17]

What never gets mentioned is the moment Lynch takes a step the man on the mark starts charging at him, never saw the umpire call play on...

Exactly. I watched this back and as Lynch starts to walk in, Andrews starts running at him. The umpire took at least 2 seconds to then yell play on. As Lynch had not gone off his mark, it is not play on at all but the unpire got sucked in seing Andrews running in so called out play on rather tahn call him on going off the mark. It is a 50mt penalty against Andrews for not standing still on the mark. Jerks!

 

[Karp3_dm]

Ffs Balme

 

[Serenity_Now]

Ffs Balme

What year did that happen?

 

[BearMe]

This was one of the quickest reviews I have ever seen, the decision from the camera angle shown was incorrect as being at 90 degrees to which being required. The AFL come out and support this nonsense in which the ball passed over the post? Having both the wrong angle and above view gives disordered view in which should not be utilised.

How could the umpire call being a goal be overturned based on the footage, I had always thought it had to be conclusive, regardless of what people think about soccer they do have clear and consistent rules unlike AFL.

 

[Karp3_dm]

What year did that happen?

Not sure exactly but had to be within the last 5 years