Remove this Banner Ad

Kurt Tippett to the Swans? **UPDATE: Tippett requests trade to Sydney***

  • Thread starter Thread starter jokiKan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Porplysia is 29 next year in novemeber by the way
Oh ok so in over a year Porplyzia will be 29. Good to know man...:thumbsu:
Highlighted for emphasis.

As an aside, it will be interesting to see how Walker will cope without another KPF as predominant as Tippett
I agree. But I think he'll be fine as he got a bit of practice this year with Tippetts injuries.
The 3 games he played when Tippett missed were..
-Geelong at Simmonds where he kicked 0.3. But to be fair it was his first game back from 3 week suspension and it was wet and windy.
-Essendon at AAMI where he kicked 4.0
-And Freo at AAMI where he kicked 4.2

Seems promising. I actually think he'll thrive being the main man down there...
 
Oh ok so in over a year Porplyzia will be 29. Good to know man...:thumbsu:

I agree. But I think he'll be fine as he got a bit of practice this year with Tippetts injuries.
The 3 games he played when Tippett missed were..
-Geelong at Simmonds where he kicked 0.3. But to be fair it was his first game back from 3 week suspension and it was wet and windy.
-Essendon at AAMI where he kicked 4.0
-And Freo at AAMI where he kicked 4.2

Seems promising. I actually think he'll thrive being the main man down there...


Funny what you reply to and what you don't

You mentined age, just educating you on your own list yet again
 
Hang on, weren't you saying that we didn't offer enough in a trade for Tippett - and yet you give the above glowing recommendation?

So you say this about a guy who his injury issues and finished 15th on your B&F but he's worth more than 23 + White? Really?

I was actually trying to make a constructive contribution to the debate.

Do you really want to go there?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Yeah and I said Porplyzia is 27. What is wrong with that statement? How are you educating me? How old are you?


Im proplysias age 27 turning 29 soon

Nothing wrong with mentioning his age, but i was correcting you with the truth
 
I was actually trying to make a constructive contribution to the debate.

Do you really want to go there?
Huh? You were the one who said that by not offering enough we came out of the trade not smelling like roses. So who wen't where now?
 
What I'm wondering is given that Walker seemed unhappy at the club and people were talking about him leaving last year, what did Adelaide offer to get him to sign a new contract? Time will tell ...

Offered a clause which enables Walker to be traded at the end of the contract to the club of his choice, in return for a second-round draft pick - compensation well below the key forward's market worth, plus the rest, but we'll find that out at trade time.

 
Huh? You were the one who said that by not offering enough we came out of the trade not smelling like roses. So who wen't where now?

Perhaps you should re read the post. My statement that neither club came of smelling if roses related to the whole process.

If you want to go over ground that's been covered ad nauseam fine. My personal opinion of tippett is entirely irrelevant. I think he and his role are overrated. You won a flag with Pyke and we can cover him with jenkins or mckernan. That's how i see it.

But here's the thing....neither your club or my club share that opinion. Your club is happy to make him one of the highest paid in the afl. They see him as very valuable. Independent recruiters valued him as 1 x early or 2x later first round picks.

That said, what is becoming clear, is that we would have taken 23 alone. What you cant seem to get your head around is that white did not add value to the package. It detracted. He is on an inflated salary which you wanted to off load. We did not need him from a list viewpoint, and we certainly did not need his salary.

So he was clearly worth more than 23 + a fine.

Just remember my post was a positive discussion about reid. You chose to turn it into a tired, circular debate that will never find resolution.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It wont be a bad thing if gws trap Tippett on draft day. It will mean that their salary cap strain will come to bare earlier.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Sorry dude, you started off as being one of (the only?) the Crows supporter who could actually think logically about this situation but if you post on the Swans board about how we come out of this looking bad then you will be called out for it.
Perhaps you should re read the post. My statement that neither club came of smelling if roses related to the whole process.
No need to re-read it. The only issue you could point to was what we offered. What other part of the process left us "not smelling like roses"?

If you want to go over ground that's been covered ad nauseam fine. My personal opinion of tippett is entirely irrelevant. I think he and his role are overrated. You won a flag with Pyke and we can cover him with jenkins or mckernan. That's how i see it.
LOL. Your opinion of Tippett is not irrelevant to what you posted two days ago? That was what my post was obviously referring to.

But here's the thing....neither your club or my club share that opinion. Your club is happy to make him one of the highest paid in the afl. They see him as very valuable. Independent recruiters valued him as 1 x early or 2x later first round picks.
We see him, in a trade, as worth pick 23 + White. You guys keep saying the same thing - that if we are paying him such and such in wages then we must think he is worth what you want in a trade. We think he is worth what we offered. Seems kind of obvious.

That said, what is becoming clear, is that we would have taken 23 alone. What you cant seem to get your head around is that white did not add value to the package. It detracted. He is on an inflated salary which you wanted to off load. We did not need him from a list viewpoint, and we certainly did not need his salary.
Of course I can get my head around that. When have I ever indicated otherwise. You are completely wrong but I understand that is what you think. As I said, if you didn't want him, just reject the offer ...

So he was clearly worth more than 23 + a fine.
If that's the way you look at it then I agree.

Just remember my post was a positive discussion about reid. You chose to turn it into a tired, circular debate that will never find resolution.
What nonsense. This has gone on for a month and what I referred to you said only two days ago. This whole thing has been circular from day one and you have been here the whole time. Don't act like suddenly it bores you and you aren't a part of it. You are still on our board in the same thread.
 
I was trying to have a discussion about footy. I then felt the need to correct you on the multiple incorrect statements you made previously regarding Adelaide and Adelaide players...
Couldn't you have this discussion on the main board or teh bay or your own board? Maybe not your own board, anyone else posts there they get carded apparently
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom