We need some pace and some flair in the middle.
Should we bring Cameron in and try Betts on the ball for a few spurts?
Should we bring Cameron in and try Betts on the ball for a few spurts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we should try keeping Danger off the piss on Friday nights first.
You're seriously suggesting taking our only forward worth a pinch of salt out of the forwardline?
Bring Cameron in. We need something in the middle. We'll lose anyway.
I thought the knock on Eddie was that he didn't have the tank for the midfield
FFS we recruit a specialist small forward and you want to play him in the midfield? Hasn't got the size, stamina for it, and besides, take him out of our forward line and were bottom of the ladder! Geez overreaction much.
I'm not too fussed about the where but just play Cameron.
Look at the reward St Kilda gets in playing Templeton off the rookie list.
I would leave Betts in the forward line ( he kicks goals!) , and with the very occasional run through the midfield, however, I would bring in Petrenko to complement Betts in the forward line and have someone else to also provide forward line pressure and pace.
In addition, I would bring in Cameron as a high h/f or wingman/outside midfielder as he provides pace, flair and defensive pressure and it is entirely irrelevant that he is only a rookie - he has what we lack.
I'm just joking because he looked so out of sorts on Saturday, can't remember him having a single good touch all game.Is this fact or supposition on your part?
That's crazy talk.I've got a ripper of an idea which will add speed to the midfield, how about we actually play Dangerfield in the midfield?! The amount of time he spent in the forward line against Port was ridiculous.
Why not play both in the forwardline?
At least it will be exciting.
I dislike this post because it's trueI reckon Pets is a certainty this week