Highlights for those of us who are still at work??
Essendon will be firing a few shots through the courts although they may well be blanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Highlights for those of us who are still at work??
How can they challenge it?What else is Little supposed to do?
They've waited, prepared themselves and now acted.
No-one really knows what's going to happen. I wouldn't expect anything less should it have been our club.
How can they challenge it?
You can't fight City Hall.
They accepted being kicked out of the finals and took the fine for being cheats.
We didn't challenge our salary cap penalties.
They were going to sue Greg Swann for calling them cheats...
No way in hell would I want Carlton to fight tooth & nail against anti dopingYou either do nothing or you take a shot.
Essendon are taking a shot based on their legal advice. What did they tell them?
80/20? 70/30? 50/50? Who knows but they're doing exactly what we would have wanted our club to do..............not lay down.
Lots of things can come up and happen through the process and no disrespect to anyone here but...............we just don't know.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
What does it mean if they challenge ASADA and lose?
Millions of dollars down the drain to prevent players being banned for six month to two years.
They've muddied the waters enough by taking shots at ASADA by using spin doctors and sympathetic journalists.
ASADA wouldn't send out 34 SC notices for a S2 drug on a whim.
Do the crime, do the time.
Even Reimers thought it was unusual, but went along with it.
They were happy to be part of a process that they say is unlawful as long as the outcome was favourable to them. As soon as these notices arrived they decide the process is unlawful.
Do they want this to drag out longer? ASADA might decide to start the investigation again, is that what they want?
Blame everyone else is what they are doing. Getting offside with the AFL is not a good idea.
What a horrible club.
Essendon must go on and if they were forced to take a year or two off then the future of the club has to be in jeopardy. You are talking about a business which turns over 50 million dollars and employs hundreds of people.
I have 000000000000000.0% sympathy.
**** them.
That's the thing.
Our lack of sympathy doesn't allow us to discuss this rationally. We're too tilted from the get go.
Id feel the same way, regardless of the club. Do the crime, do the time.
What if they win?
They get off doping charges on a technicality.
If they actually thought they were innocent, they would put that case forward through the Show Cause Notices.
This action brands their players as drug cheats, regardless of the outcome.

Basically if Little and Essendon* can drag this through the courts for long enough, the older players who would have retired because of the INs would be allowed to play out their last couple of years at the club, then retire and if the bans do go through, the club is in a much better position because they would have had a couple of years to replenish the list with bottom draft picks and rookie picks.What does it mean if they challenge ASADA and lose?
Millions of dollars down the drain to prevent players being banned for six month to two years.
They've muddied the waters enough by taking shots at ASADA by using spin doctors and sympathetic journalists.
ASADA wouldn't send out 34 SC notices for a S2 drug on a whim.
Do the crime, do the time.
Even Reimers thought it was unusual, but went along with it.
We dumped Bootsma because his last act showed he wasn't a professional footballer.What if they win?
They've had forever to cover all bases.
They'd have some idea of the risks and are weighing them up against the rewards.
Just saying that we have little (excuse the pun) idea of how this will end up, regardless of whether we've sat for a bar or not
We dumped Bootsma because his last act showed he wasn't a professional footballer.
Their actions were bad enough to have them penalised draft picks, kicked out of the finals and fined.
What will theirliarslawyers say?
"It's the vibe".
If they win, then it's OK to inject thymosin beta 4 into players and have them use the "I didn't know it was banned" technicality. ASADA and WADA doesn't stomach ignorance in sport as a defense. Some don't take OTC tablets for a cold. Ahmed Saad lost a year after drinking a supplement he had been given. Their legal actions are a stake to the heart of sport that is supposed to be fair and drug free.
The loneliest people in the 2014 trade week... the Essendon* recruiters as they try and trade all and sundry players for picks.All I'm saying is to put yourself in Little's position. What would you do?
Bend over and take it, or explore every option open to you? It's obvious isn't it? You know what is expected of you.
The loneliest people in the 2014 trade week... the Essendon* recruiters as they try and trade all and sundry players for picks.
I am willing to be that there will be at least 20 Essendon players on the table come the end of the year if Essendon* manage to tie things up in the courts for that long.
