Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Nope.I hope you put some money on that double bato.
But Nadal has knocked Federer out in Grand Slams so many times that it is a pretty significant stat, tbf.It is pointless saying if player X wasn't playing, player Y would have won such and such. You play in a grand slam and need to beat 7 players to win the title. You have no control over who your 7 opponents will be.
Yeah but you can make the same argument many times over.But Nadal has knocked Federer out in Grand Slams so many times that it is a pretty significant stat, tbf.
If Pete Sampras wasn't around, Tim henman would have won multiple wimbledon titles.
Yeah but you can make the same argument many times over.
If federer wasn't playing, roddick would have won many grand slams.
If Pete Sampras wasn't around, Tim henman would have won multiple wimbledon titles.
If serena Williams wasn't around, Sharapova would have won more grand slams.
You can make that statement about so many players.
Lets not go that far, he would have choked as usual!
And, if Nadal wasn't around then Novak would've won the FO by now.
True lol Rafter would've won wimbledon not Henman
Yeah but you can make the same argument many times over.
If federer wasn't playing, roddick would have won many grand slams.
If Pete Sampras wasn't around, Tim henman would have won multiple wimbledon titles.
If serena Williams wasn't around, Sharapova would have won more grand slams.
You can make that statement about so many players.
Nadal doesn't make it to the second week anymore, he can beat Murray, just pushed Djokovic to 5 sets etc.
He has a chance next year if he plays like this.
Oh no doubt, I'm not disputing that. But I read something (can't remember where it was, see if I can find it tomorrow) that statistically showed how Nadal has been a bigger 'road block' to Federer than any other player has to another in the history of the game. Something like that.Yeah but you can make the same argument many times over.
If federer wasn't playing, roddick would have won many grand slams.
If Pete Sampras wasn't around, Tim henman would have won multiple wimbledon titles.
If serena Williams wasn't around, Sharapova would have won more grand slams.
You can make that statement about so many players.
Apart from Middle Sunday*That awkward moment for the first time in two weeks there is no tennis on tonight :S
Apart from Middle Sunday*
*YTF do they persist with that BS?
Poms without their tradition would be like an elephant without it's trunk. They just cannot fathom the concept of change for the better.Apart from Middle Sunday*
*YTF do they persist with that BS?
Many traditions and customs are outdated.
Rest days in cricket were a tradition. Smoking in restaurants, offices, cinemas and planes was common. In 2014, all of those seem ridiculous.
I like what the French do. Whereas at Wimbledon they only play on 1 Sunday, at Roland Garros, they play on 3 Sundays.
And Federer would have probably had 2 or 3 Calendar Slams. Honestly it is the reason why it is so hard to compare eras. It is why I hate the GOAT thing. I can understand 'greatest in this era', but come on, how do you compare a Laver, to a Connors, to a Sampras, Federer, Rafa. It is that hard.
Wimbledon cant break from their traditions especially with wearing all white, and the royal box