- Sep 19, 2007
- 19,265
- 17,825
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Anaheim Ducks, PSV Eindhoven
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Hawthorn really should be wearing brown shorts tonight, if only for aesthetics. The white shorts tonight add nothing to the contrast between the 2 kits.
Lock in 'C' Eddie
View attachment 65869
I agree only brown shorts or gold shorts as above and I don't care if they haven't worn gold shorts before.They should never wear white shorts, full stop.
Why aren't Collingwood wearing their traditional jumper today (the white one with black stripes)?
It looks so much better than the black one when they wear white shorts and increases the contrast between the sides.
It's pretty disappointing seeing as they got it right last night with Carlton wearing the navy shorts. That being said they got it wrong that afternoon with St Kilda in White shorts vs North, St Kilda in Black shorts would have created the greater contrast even with North in the Blue Shorts.
Seems to me that the policy the AFL used is flawed as is their selective adherence to it.
EDIT: Is it just me or are the stripes on the back of Collingwood's jumper getting longer?
To be honest I'm not to fussed with the Black with white stripes, but it should only be worn with black shorts. They have the white with black stripes for a reason.correct , when eddie changed the jumper he created clashes where there were none
In another sign of the pure incompetence of the AFL on this issue, West Coast will be forced to wear ourpiece of shitclash white jumper against Richmond tomorrow night
What's wrong with wings?!
Apologies for our piss weak clash jumper too.
Club chose to wear the white clash rather than the wings when given the choice between the two, apparently:
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...-at-home-against-richmond-20140724-zwin9.html
Jack Riewoldt would be well camouflaged in this.Seems bigfooty can create an answer by the AFL/Richmond can't.
Found this on the Richmond board credit Mowse. Would work a treat wouldn't it?
No one can convince me that the tri-panel is selling more purely because it has a white bit in the middle.West Coast should never wear white when it's not part of the club's colours, purely wearing to sell more of them.
Club chose to wear the white clash rather than the wings when given the choice between the two, apparently:
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...-at-home-against-richmond-20140724-zwin9.html
The club denies that version of events.
"No, we didn't have a choice," said West Coast communications manager Gary Stocks. "We aren't happy with the current situation."
That's what the runners wear.I'm the last person who would ever stick up for the eagles, but this is a disgraceful display of VFL mentality. If Richmond can't provide an appropriate jumper for an away game they should be made to play in fluoro pink.
Did you read past the 2nd paragraph?
I'm the last person who would ever stick up for the eagles, but this is a disgraceful display of VFL mentality. If Richmond can't provide an appropriate jumper for an away game they should be made to play in fluoro pink.
Did you read past the 2nd paragraph?
I'm the last person who would ever stick up for the eagles, but this is a disgraceful display of VFL mentality. If Richmond can't provide an appropriate jumper for an away game they should be made to play in fluoro pink.