There we go, fastest 50 in history!
Was great stuff to watch!
Although I can belt a century in Don Bradman Cricket in 21 balls

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

There we go, fastest 50 in history!

Definitely, but only because he was a keeper as well. He probably could have held down number 4 but I doubt he would have averaged 47 doing so. Was definitely favoured by coming in at 7.
Top score of 80Was great stuff to watch!
Although I can belt a century in Don Bradman Cricket in 21 balls![]()
![]()



Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Should open with Maxwell and Warner with Smith and Marsh coming in after and try and chase the runs down.
What a sad ****ing joke that is.The big show is keeping?
Hughes is wondering what the **** he needs to do to get selected.
He can't? No point going on about it....The big show is keeping?
Hughes is wondering what the **** he needs to do to get selected.
Exactly Lyon or any other night watchman don't deserve to bat at three as these so called "batsman", we have in the team should go and do what their paid to do. Honestly at moment, it really doesn't matter who bats at three or any other position for that matter because none of them are deserving of their batting positions at the moment, let alone being in the team. Every single one of them have been pathetic to put it nicely. 1 hundred and only 3 or 4 50's in two tests is terrible batting, when compared to the Pakistan batting or just in general. Especially when 1 of those 50's came from Mitchell Johnson.
Mitch suffering hip soreness. Gee it will be bad if he is injured long term.
Which Mitch?
The big show is keeping?
Hughes is wondering what the **** he needs to do to get selected.
The big show is keeping?
We surrendered quite some time ago.Can we just surrender and fly home?
Which begs the question, why exactly did we select Maxwell?Oh come on, you don't pick your batsmen because they've kept at some point.
About Johnson, he must be completely knackered, he bowled a shitpile of overs in the first test.
Oh come on, you don't pick your batsmen because they've kept at some point.
About Johnson, he must be completely knackered, he bowled a shitpile of overs in the first test.
X FactorWhich begs the question, why exactly did we select Maxwell?

Well I got to watch the Aussies beat the Barbarians at Twickenham yesterday in a fine, fast-running game and Warriors are doing well against Tassie at the WACA, so I can just about stomach the shenanigans going on in the UAE. Withouth those two things, I might feel a little differently.
We selected Maxwell over Hughes because of his bowling right?
