Remove this Banner Ad

Roast The media....*Shakes Head* Part 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spadge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem is with the adelaide media sugar coating everything bad they do is it sets a certain standard at their club and their naive fans are tolerant of it. They should look at our club and what we are doing if they want any on and off field success. We are leading by example and they are all jealous of us. Hence the media bashings we get over childish tantrams of the envious crow folk.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

[Q="JimmyBeerCans, post: 41094340, member: 143213"]Yea nah spat the dummy & proved Dom was the right choice as captain.. on yer bike Shaun[/QUOTE]
Sorry he left because of Peter, choco tried to make him captain to stay. He loves port with all his heart.
 
The problem is with the adelaide media sugar coating everything bad they do is it sets a certain standard at their club and their naive fans are tolerant of it. They should look at our club and what we are doing if they want any on and off field success. We are leading by example and they are all jealous of us. Hence the media bashings we get over childish tantrams of the envious crow folk.
The sugar coating is cringeworthy, but it keeps them from being a viable threat long term. If we could get to the SA media ignoring Port, or not being actively against us, whilst still placating every Adelaide flaw we'd be in the sweet spot.
 
The Corneses, who were relentless trainers, versus the Burgoynes (one of which who turned up to training "in an unfit state" and the other who coasted at well under his capable output while Williams continued to blow smoke up his arse).

Can't see where the problem was.
This had nothing to do with why Shaun left.
 
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.

Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
 
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.

Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.

But Fevola & Brown????

Bradshaw & Brown worked pretty good. Wonder what the difference was???
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.

Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.

Lol. First it was "schulz is going to freo" then its "schulz cant be fit in the salary cap with dixon." then schulz re-signs now its "schulz should have gone, dixon and schulz won't work together"

Let it go darren (sic?), you are embarassing yourself.
 
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.

Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.


IF Journalistic integrity was a car...............

THEN Damien Barrett would be a
 
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.

Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.


Using "we" tries to make it sound like a consensus view. Or that he thinks he's Queen Victoria.
 
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.

Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.

The boys should put a poster of that up in the change rooms in the off season and use that as motivation to prove this clown wrong, again!!!!!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.

Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
Thing is, the Footy Show promotes this knob as the best in the business. Whatever credibility that show may have had left, it evaporated with that statement.
 
Lol. First it was "schulz is going to freo" then its "schulz cant be fit in the salary cap with dixon." then schulz re-signs now its "schulz should have gone, dixon and schulz won't work together"

Let it go darren (sic?), you are embarassing yourself.


Wtf is he on about.

Firstly if port play two key forward next year we are hardly breaking the mold. Like 2 key forwards have never played together before right?

Secondly they are completely different forwards.

Has this bloke ever watched football or what? He has to have some agenda against port. He can't be this stupid surely...
 
Wtf is he on about.

Firstly if port play two key forward next year we are hardly breaking the mold. Like 2 key forwards have never played together before right?

Secondly they are completely different forwards.

Has this bloke ever watched football or what? He has to have some agenda against port. He can't be this stupid surely...

You would be surprised.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom