- Joined
- Oct 7, 2004
- Posts
- 11,881
- Reaction score
- 15,902
- Location
- Adelaide, South Australia
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #27,451
behind our backs?And this is purely the reason why the other states laugh at us behind our backs.
#sagreat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

behind our backs?And this is purely the reason why the other states laugh at us behind our backs.
#sagreat
Wife just alerted me to this.
For anyone outside of SA, this is legitimate.
http://www.news.com.au/national/sou...e-adelaide-crows/story-fnii5yv4-1227540777047
#cringelaidebehind our backs?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The sugar coating is cringeworthy, but it keeps them from being a viable threat long term. If we could get to the SA media ignoring Port, or not being actively against us, whilst still placating every Adelaide flaw we'd be in the sweet spot.The problem is with the adelaide media sugar coating everything bad they do is it sets a certain standard at their club and their naive fans are tolerant of it. They should look at our club and what we are doing if they want any on and off field success. We are leading by example and they are all jealous of us. Hence the media bashings we get over childish tantrams of the envious crow folk.
This had nothing to do with why Shaun left.The Corneses, who were relentless trainers, versus the Burgoynes (one of which who turned up to training "in an unfit state" and the other who coasted at well under his capable output while Williams continued to blow smoke up his arse).
Can't see where the problem was.
No, but we didn't get to see the Shaun we all thought we eventually would. Post 2004 Choco I'm sure is responsible for some of my gray and missing hairs.This had nothing to do with why Shaun left.
Does that mean he's going to paint his bum blue and wave it at us?Did you hear (8172763 million times) that he's going to get his William Wallace war paint on?

behind our backs?
I thought it was well known that it was a family situation that was the driving factor. Not the only factor, but certainly the driving one.You seemed as if you had inside info. Shaun can drink egg nog for mine.
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.
Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.
Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.
Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
Stop it I just sprayed my laptop with coffeeIn retrospect I should have sat my then 9 and 7yos down when we lost Troy Chaplin, and made sure they were dealing with it ok.
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.
Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.
Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
agree the "we" just gives me the opinion that he is narcissistic and believes everything he says is gospelUsing "we" tries to make it sound like a consensus view. Or that he thinks he's Queen Victoria.
Thing is, the Footy Show promotes this knob as the best in the business. Whatever credibility that show may have had left, it evaporated with that statement.Jeez Damian Barrett is a flog. via the AFL app and his 'sliding doors' column he has stated;
IF theres one arrangement we don't see working next year.....
THEN ....it is a forward line of Dixon and Schulz.
Does this guy have any clue? two very different forwards one stay at home and one lead up.
agree the "we" just gives me the opinion that he is narcissistic and believes everything he says is gospel
He probably heard Gary Lyon say it at the urinals.
Lol. First it was "schulz is going to freo" then its "schulz cant be fit in the salary cap with dixon." then schulz re-signs now its "schulz should have gone, dixon and schulz won't work together"
Let it go darren (sic?), you are embarassing yourself.
Wtf is he on about.
Firstly if port play two key forward next year we are hardly breaking the mold. Like 2 key forwards have never played together before right?
Secondly they are completely different forwards.
Has this bloke ever watched football or what? He has to have some agenda against port. He can't be this stupid surely...
