Remove this Banner Ad

Traded James Aish [traded to Collingwood for #26 and St Kilda's 2016 second round pick]

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Or

3. Brisbane trade him to Collingwood.

I'll lock in #3, Ed.

Why don't you read my post properly?

Brisbane won't be trading Aish to Collingwood after the trade period ends. He'll then have two options. See above.
 
Have to feel sorry for the Lions. Their trade philosophy is why their performance is how it is today..
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

As far as I can see, Brisbane can mitigate the loss but right now, and every decision they have made with Aish, has been the worst possible result.

1. It would have been pick 5 & Aish. Aish was happy to leave,

There is absolutely no evidence that Aish was "happy to leave" Brisbane at the end of 2014.
 
I think at some point you're going to need to come to grips with the fact your not going to get adequate compensation for a bloke who has requested a trade to a specific club. Thats why the go-home-boys were/are so damaging.

You're going to get unders, how far unders is up to Brisbane. Sending him to the draft and getting nothing is absurd, Collingwood is the team you'll be getting the most from but as i previously stated, it will be unders.

Youll be extremely lucky if you get a 2nd rounder and a player

A 2nd rounder in this draft is virtually nothing anyway so there's no loss.
 
Have to feel sorry for the Lions. Their trade philosophy is why their performance is how it is today..

I think you can claim a lot of things about Brisbane, but talent identification and trade philosophy is an area Brisbane has had plenty of wins, with the likes of Staker, Martin, West, Beams, Robinson, Raines and Christensen all providing useful contributions over the last five years.
 
I dunno what his specific role is, but if Eddie or Gary Pert came out and said Freeman would not be traded, I'd want them to shut up and let the real team handle it.

Leigh Matthews is the Football Director of the Brisbane Lions. And Vice-Chairman.

Just because you've been stiff of recent years with retaining players, it doesn't mean you have right to use Aish as a scapegoat.

Under AFL rules Brisbane have every right to send Aish to the draft should they so decide.
 
Last edited:
Brisbane supporters fall into two camps. There's the "no trade"rs, and they're not going to be satisfied with anything. There's the "negotiating position" ones, and I think most of us think two early second rounders is in the ballpark for minimum acceptable. However I'm not sure where the club sits but I'd imagine it'd be at least that as minimum acceptable, but could actually be higher. It's hard to read the situation since we've only found out where Aish was heading a few days ago.

I still don't get the impression that Oxley interests us - check out who we've been strongly linked to and they've all been confirmed fairly early on, in Bell and Jansen and maybe Whitecross and Suckling initially but then mutual cooling. It's not like Swann has been particularly backwards in confirming this kind of thing, so if we were pursuing Oxley I suspect it would have made the news some time ago and been confirmed - especially since he's uncontracted still.

Well he's from Queensland and out of contract. And it just so happens that he had a good year in what was essentially his first year with a proper go at it.

I can imagine the reason you haven't declared interest in him is simply because then this Aish trade would make way too much sense. Which it does.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

As far as I can see, Brisbane can mitigate the loss but right now, and every decision they have made with Aish, has been the worst possible result.

1. Last year Collingwood asked for Aish in the Beams trade. It would have been pick 5 & Aish. Aish was happy to leave, but Brisbane knocked it back.

2. They included Pick 25 and Jack Crisp instead of Aish.

3. They are now going to lose Aish for nothing.

If there was a way to mitigate any potential loss in a player, Brisbane have gone as extreme as you can go in the opposite direction.

So Collingwood is mooted to be offering, at a minimum, a second rounder and a player.

And you're arguing that by dealing last year Brisbane could have saved themselves a second rounder but cost themselves more than that in 2015? So we'd have been worse off if we'd traded Aish last year?

I'm not sure your logic makes sense, even disregarding no credible reports of Aish wanting or nominating to leave as part of the Beams trade - unlike Crisp, who did put his hand up.
 
I think you can claim a lot of things about Brisbane, but talent identification and trade philosophy is an area Brisbane has had plenty of wins, with the likes of Staker, Martin, West, Beams, Robinson, Raines and Christensen all providing useful contributions over the last five years.

Even though the likes may be true, didn't really effect their ladder position. That is what I am referring to.

On a lighter note, I just saw this on a post on social media:

Brisbane will negotiate with Collingwood over James Aish.

But they must wait until ruckman Matthew Leuenberger choses between Sydney and Essendon, and the Pies close a deal with GWS for gun midfielder Adam Treloar, before they know what picks they hold, and what are available.

- Courier Mail
 
I think you can claim a lot of things about Brisbane, but talent identification and trade philosophy is an area Brisbane has had plenty of wins, with the likes of Staker, Martin, West, Beams, Robinson, Raines and Christensen all providing useful contributions over the last five years.

Nice padding. You didn't recruit beams or Christenson. Robinson was a gamble that's worked. Staker and West?
 
Brisbane have every right to send Aish to the draft should they so decide.

Why would you, though? It's an unnecessary scapegoat solely because Pa has stamped his feet.

It's like uploading naked photos of an ex girlfriend just because you fell out of love.

You do what's right, you remain a chance to get a good one and maintain your reputation.

Ps sorry about the terrible analogy.
 
It's not unlucky it was stupidity and arrogance.
Another ignorant comment.
Thanks. Its easy for me to know who of the Melbourne journos to listen to and who not to, but it's harder for the interstate journos because we just don't see their stuff often. So thanks for the info.
We don't see much of Brisbane journos talking AFL either ..... Unless you look for the two paragraphs on the 6th back page of the sports section for any article on AFL. (Essendon drugs scale exception).
 
Have to feel sorry for the Lions. Their trade philosophy is why their performance is how it is today..

We managed to turn the 5 going home trades to the following bolded ones. Talent identification is not an issue for us, retention is.

In the list below, everyone bar Aish have re-signed. We are doing ok.


Brisbane Lions AFL Draft Picks at the end of Season 2013 2013 AFL Draft Summary
Type Round Pick Player Current Team Games Since Drafted *
National 1 7 James Aish Brisbane 32
National 2 22 Darcy Gardiner Brisbane 25
National 2 25
Daniel McStay Brisbane 29
National 2 28
Lewis Taylor Brisbane 44
National 2 33
Tom Cutler Brisbane 18
National 2 34
Nicholas Robertson Brisbane 20
National 4 62 Jonathan Freeman Brisbane 10
National 5 75 Rookie Promotion Justin Clarke Brisbane 42
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Leigh Matthews is the Football Director of the Brisbane Lions. And Vice-Chairman.



Brisbane have every right to send Aish to the draft should they so decide.


Isn't it Aish that chooses if he'll enter the PSD or not? He's uncontracted so BFC has very little say in it. Surely pushing players into the PSD is against the AFLPA's charter?
 
Anderson and a swap of picks. Two young gun whingers. Make it happen.
 
Absolutely spot on. We can't draft on talent alone .. I've we can't just pick the best player available at our draft pick .... But have to also guess if they can handle being away from Mummy, a non -AFL state etc.etc. Certainly not a level playing field.

A non Afl state bathed in sunshine with awesome beaches... why would anyone want to leave?
 
Even though the likes may be true, didn't really effect their ladder position. That is what I am referring to.

Yeah, our lack of forward targets have really hurt us. Staker was good but then he's spent most of the last two years injured. Maguane even more so. :( The less said about Fev the better, and at least Lisle was cheap. Hopefully Schache finally improves that story.

On a lighter note, I just saw this on a post on social media:
Brisbane will negotiate with Collingwood over James Aish.

But they must wait until ruckman Matthew Leuenberger choses between Sydney and Essendon, and the Pies close a deal with GWS for gun midfielder Adam Treloar, before they know what picks they hold, and what are available.

- Courier Mail

Yeah, that's an assumption made by Andrew Hamilton, who's got the credibility of a Hagdorn or Rucci, but probably on target.
 
Nice padding. You didn't recruit beams or Christenson. Robinson was a gamble that's worked. Staker and West?

Staker was traded for Pick 39 and played 50 games for the Lions, before retiring.
West was traded for Pick 41 and has played 12 games for the club. 27 years old he is still on the Lions list.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom