Power Raid
We Exist To Win Premierships
Shitty spin on a stupid question.
It is the heart of the issue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shitty spin on a stupid question.
If you actually thought you had a solid point, you wouldn't need to constantly exaggerate, over use hyperbole, and frame ridiculous questions that can only give the answer you want.It is the heart of the issue.
How can anyone take the Murdoch pres seriously.
I noticed the headline on Google and regretfully decided to click on it:
Brussels attacks: Australian Muslim families are under pressure like never before
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...e/news-story/a919d5edee0d736b9232cadd1d756a39
Within the 26 paragraphs, there was only one line "Australian Muslim families today are under pressure like never before" that had any link to the headline.
Seriously people pay to read this?
Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation has slipped into the red, reporting a third-quarter loss of US$149m (A$200m) after revenue dropped 7.3%. Advertising revenue fell 9.7% and circulation and subscription revenue dropped 3.6%, while the company also took a $US280m pre-tax hit from a lawsuit.
...
Meanwhile, Fairfax Media said revenue for the first 17 weeks of its second half was down between 2% and 3%. The company said metro media revenue, which includes the Domain real estate advertising business, was up about 2%.
They may be spinning but it seems more half-hearted, they appear to also be having a go at him at the same.Just pointing out that everything usual is still happening.
Fairfax is still hinting they might scrap weekday prints and News Corp is talking cost-cutting in the UK and Aus:
News Corp still spinning as hard as ever:
I feel sincere pity for anyone who believes the Murdoch press.How can anyone take the Murdoch pres seriously.
The thing with this is it shows how little respect they have for the intelligence of their own readers. When they use slogans and outrageous spin, like Abbott did, they are really saying 'this is all you people will ever understand'.
"Of course, it's hard to help workers if the economy is stuffed."
"Of course, it's hard to help workers if the economy is stuffed."
The DT has nailed it in one. Governments can't do s**t for anyone if the economy is stuffed!
It is a simple point. Company tax is at crazy levels. No one is going to hire extra staff when govts are over taxing. It has been proven over and over again that reducing company tax results in a rise in actual tax revenue.-----------Point------------->
Lebbo's head.
So I guess you'll have no problem proving it then (please go ahead!).It is a simple point. Company tax is at crazy levels. No one is going to hire extra staff when govts are over taxing. It has been proven over and over again that reducing company tax results in a rise in actual tax revenue.
It is a simple point. Company tax is at crazy levels. No one is going to hire extra staff when govts are over taxing. It has been proven over and over again that reducing company tax results in a rise in actual tax revenue.
Shorten us being a deceptive campaigner when he carries on about class warfare. He supported all of these policies at some stage. Most of them recently. Besides, most people on under $80k don't pay much tax. Those with children actually pay very little net tax.
The only way we can create enough jobs for Australians is through business. Govts can't do this.
It happened under Howard for starters!So I guess you'll have no problem proving it then (please go ahead!).
The Howard/Rudd tax cuts are a big part of the reason we are in deficit. They were made when the economy was going gangbusters. Gangbusters cannot last forever and sure enough a year later it was gone. The supposed rise in revenue from cutting taxes has categorically not happened. Unsurprisingly cutting taxes has cut revenue. Just like when you give the Clubhouse less money, they give you less golf balls to smack onto the driving range.It happened under Howard for starters!
So I guess you'll have no problem proving it then (please go ahead!).