Membling
Brownlow Medallist
WTFI Knightmare
Probably best poster on the d and t board.
Rate his work
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WTFI Knightmare
Good for him, this is our board,what is he the David King of BFProbably best poster on the d and t board.
Rate his work
Good for him, this is our board,what is he the David King of BF
So Tom Derickx is now part of an electronic band that is produced by Ryan Brabazon! Haha have to say their first single is actually pretty good!
http://kayexlife.bandcamp.com/track/two-songs
This one time....bandcamp is an unfortunate name for the site.
had 13 tackles or something on the weekend. Made me take note of his name for the 1st time in a long timeI knew there was a reason derickx suckes. Too busy focusing on his music career. Guess hes wise to focus on life after footy
Probably more worried about bruce's gooHad a nightmare lastnight. We were playing Hawthorn is this years GF and at the 20 minute mark of the second after they kicked a goal we were down 28 - 64 and Bruce was gooing everywhere.
Im hoping its just a case of I think we will make the GF but am worried if we will show up or not
Really don't think it should be for a ruck tap. If there's a ball up on the boundary line on the wing and it's tapped out on the full, I'm fairly sure it's a throw in. Shouldn't be called deliberate rushed behind either, as it's not like the ruckman isn't under any pressure.Want to ask a question, figure here is a good place to do it? I was at a local senior game this weekend and the following happened, A ball up in the attacking goal square for team A, the attacking ruckman hits the ball through for a behind (the team was down by a point, the behind drew scores level with a few seconds left on clock). Umpire confers with goal umpire and rules free kick to the defending side, presumably for knocking ball though on full. As it was the attacking ruckman who hit it through, is this ruling correct? Any thoughts...
Want to ask a question, figure here is a good place to do it? I was at a local senior game this weekend and the following happened, A ball up in the attacking goal square for team A, the attacking ruckman hits the ball through for a behind (the team was down by a point, the behind drew scores level with a few seconds left on clock). Umpire confers with goal umpire and rules free kick to the defending side, presumably for knocking ball though on full. As it was the attacking ruckman who hit it through, is this ruling correct? Any thoughts...
Should have knocked it down and let it roll throughYep you can't knock it over the goal line on the full from a ruck contest...similarly you can't knock it over the boundary on the full either. The umpires got it absolutely spot on by the sounds of it.
Should have knocked it down and let it roll through
Actually the more I think about it, the attacking team probably are allowed to knock it through their own goals, so perhaps this shouldn't have been a free-kick after all.
+1I can't quote the actual rule, but I'd be astounded if the attacking team couldn't deliberately knock it through the posts for a score...
I can't quote the actual rule, but I'd be astounded if the attacking team couldn't deliberately knock it through the posts for a score...
Really? I think as long as you arent throwing the thing through then its got a place.Yeh I think you're right...whether they should technically be able to is another topic for debate though.
Really? I think as long as you arent throwing the thing through then its got a place.
Hmm i like the rule how it is. But i get what your sayingIt's a very rare occasion that it would happen like in the above situation I guess...just think the aim of the game is to kick goals, the point for kicking a behind is consolation as opposed to something someone would ever intentionally try and score.
Hmm i like the rule how it is. But i get what your saying
This was on ongoing debate post game as you could imagine, it all depends on if the rule is interpreted differently whether attacking or defending. This was the third or fourth ball up in a row, every defender was around the ball it seemed so the option made sense, I guess it isnt a rushed behind, it is considered touched...very odd, never seen this happen before.Actually the more I think about it, the attacking team probably are allowed to knock it through their own goals, so perhaps this shouldn't have been a free-kick after all.