Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

"Goddess"

Poor bloke...ACL
Having said that we'll probably offer him & Morabito five year deals.
Tom Browne on twitter just posted Ahern has done his ACL again. If true can see him being included in the deal to get him off GWS books. Unfortunate for the young man
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
"Goddess"

We already have Byrne on the out for most of next year. Recruiting someone who has just done his knee for the 2nd time? I'm sorry but that's the dumbest thing I've heard
"Goddess"

Sad news for Ahern.
If true that's 2 ACLs in the last 12 months and he will no doubt miss the entire 2017 season. Would we even want him?
"Goddess"

Is it the same knee?
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Odds of Marchbank for pick 23 + Ahern and Pickett for 'free' just rose! And apparently these kids have more 'potential' in their little finger than Lamb or Kedgeree.If taking Ahern reduces what GWS are willing to accept for Marchbank, then IMO that is a good result, plus if he comes good he is a former top 10 pick.
As a club, we are not it a position to take anymore "dud deals" We already have enough players that have had serious injury during their career which could return any time nowYou do realise we need to take on a few "dud deals" on from GWS in order to get the players we want.
Plowman was worth a hell of a lot more than pick 28, but we got a discount taking Sumner, Lamb and Phillips.
If taking Ahern reduces what GWS are willing to accept for Marchbank, then IMO that is a good result, plus if he comes good he is a former top 10 pick.
As a club, we are not it a position to take anymore "dud deals" We already have enough players that have had serious injury during their career which could return any time now
As a club, we are not it a position to take anymore "dud deals" We already have enough players that have had serious injury during their career which could return any time now
****en ACLs ! The sooner medical science comes up with a way to stop this injury the better...Sad news for Ahern.
If true that's 2 ACLs in the last 12 months and he will no doubt miss the entire 2017 season. Would we even want him?
Odds of Marchbank for pick 23 + Ahern and Pickett for 'free' just rose! And apparently these kids have more 'potential' in their little finger than Lamb or Kedgeree.
According to Jay Clark Simmo has already triggered a one year extension back in July. It would be a bit michevous for the club to claim that as a re-signing if true.
You do realise we need to take on a few "dud deals" on from GWS in order to get the players we want.
Plowman was worth a hell of a lot more than pick 28, but we got a discount taking Sumner, Lamb and Phillips.
If taking Ahern reduces what GWS are willing to accept for Marchbank, then IMO that is a good result, plus if he comes good he is a former top 10 pick.
You can't take Ahern for a year then delist. Unethical.The opposite is correct.
Say (just a hypothetical here) Pickett and Ahern are so injured they will never play again, and we are really interested in Marchbank who is worth pick 10 (just a hypothectical value).
Instead of playing funny buggers and downgrading pick 5 etc, GWS who have to downgrade their list numbers say "Look if you take these two injured blokes we will give you Marchbank for the discounted rate of pick 23".
We chuck Picket and Ahern on the list for a year and then delist.
With the amount of serious injuries Marchbank has had in his short career, we would be stupid to pay anything more than pick 23 for him alone.The opposite is correct.
Say (just a hypothetical here) Pickett and Ahern are so injured they will never play again, and we are really interested in Marchbank who is worth pick 10 (just a hypothectical value).
Instead of playing funny buggers and downgrading pick 5 etc, GWS who have to downgrade their list numbers say "Look if you take these two injured blokes we will give you Marchbank for the discounted rate of pick 23".
We chuck Picket and Ahern on the list for a year and then delist.
You can't take Ahern for a year then delist. Unethical.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Sounds a bit harsh but I get where you are coming from. We take the risk and reap the reward if they come good but lose nothing if they don't. You would have to think that a gamble on a couple of top ten picks with injury issues would have odds no worse than a speculative 3rd or 4th rounder turning into a star.The opposite is correct.
Say (just a hypothetical here) Pickett and Ahern are so injured they will never play again, and we are really interested in Marchbank who is worth pick 10 (just a hypothectical value).
Instead of playing funny buggers and downgrading pick 5 etc, GWS who have to downgrade their list numbers say "Look if you take these two injured blokes we will give you Marchbank for the discounted rate of pick 23".
We chuck Picket and Ahern on the list for a year and then delist.
Agreed. It'd be a calculated risk which I'm not adverse to going with.Sounds a bit harsh but I get where you are coming from. We take the risk and reap the reward if they come good but lose nothing if they don't. You would have to think that a gamble on a couple of top ten picks with injury issues would have odds no worse than a speculative 3rd or 4th rounder doing likewise.
You can't take Ahern for a year then delist. Unethical.
