Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion thread - The sequel - I know what SOS did last Sumner

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Palmer would make a lot of sense for the 5th. Would be on somewhat decent coin for a guy who isn't in their best 22 for next year. Slides very nicely into our half forward line with some time in the midfield. Pretty underrated the last couple of years.

Only other guy that would make sense from our point of view would be Adam Kennedy. With a few of their other guys emerging in the back half this year he might look for other opportunities. If we lose Tuohy, Kennedy would be an awesome replacement.
 
Exactly!
People like Jabba73 and TerryWallet may desperately want to see us get rid of quality at any cost, but wait until they see what that is replaced with. We need quality! Don't get rid of Gibbs unless it is a bloody good deal!

I really wouldn't bat an eyelid if Gibbs remains at Carlton. As several rational people have pointed out over the last week, Gibbs will only be traded if Gibbs has a major input into that happening.

He is contracted long term. If he wants to stay, he will stay. Just like Hartlett.

But if he and the club decide to trade him, and recieve Pick 13 for him, i will be content that that is the best we could do and because that is about his mark.

And if the Pick 5 trade for players eventuates, Gibbs is the best way, indeed our only way, to get back highish in the draft.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Where were the Pups re the window last October, I wonder...

Dogs made the finals last year and this year, a year that was very even for the top 8 sides, they capitalised by winning one ahead of time.

Unlike the last couple of times we made finals, then dropped out the following year

Nurture and build a group of youngsters to come through together, while having SOME senior players around.

Wondering how the dogs supporters felt when Griffen was traded out for Boyd in the first 18 months of that deal and how the feel now.

That's why a Gibbs trade would not hurt us medium to long term, if the compensation suited our list strategy


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Gibbs has 4-5 more years. Strong, durable player.
Agreed. Maybe it's my blue blinkers but Gibbs looks to be incrementally improving rather than plateauing. He would improve even more in a good side, hopefully that side is CFC.

If not, it would want to be a damn, damn good offer.
 
One thing to remember with Gibbs. If he does want to leave and he and his other half a driving the move...you'd want them to go. Who wants a Gibbs that doesn't want to be at the club. Over his ten years at the club, he has at times struggled to go hard for the ball. I'd hate to see that gibbs re-surface on the back of a failed player-driven trade.
 
We have to get past all the SOS love but seriously - you set a very low bar.

GWS didn't want these players they were under contract and we did GWS a favour by taking them - we accepted the deal without getting the player we wanted Tomlinson.

Yes they played games for us because yes our list was bad, but getting second rate players is bot gotoing to get us anywhere but mid table at best.

Put Lamb and Sumners numbers together and you might have a player, Jury still out on Plowman and Phillip.

Kerridge and Wright ok, but only good ordinary players and Kerridge is a ball butcherer of epic proportions.


If SOS gives up pick 5 for the group of players mentioned then we've learnt nothing from last year.


Marchbank has hardly played any football in two years at AFL level and barely played any in his final TAC year, he's out of contract and wants to come back to Melbourne a second round draft pick is more than enough for him, particularly when all the AFL pundits are sagely nodding in agreement that Collingwood is only going to give GWS a third rounder for Hoskin-Elliott.
Very negative....
 
One thing to remember with Gibbs. If he does want to leave and he and his other half a driving the move...you'd want them to go. Who wants a Gibbs that doesn't want to be at the club. Over his ten years at the club, he has at times struggled to go hard for the ball. I'd hate to see that gibbs re-surface on the back of a failed player-driven trade.

Never once have I heard Gibbs say he wants out.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I really hope we don't trade pick 5 for pick 19 as the rumour I've heard says we will. I can't see why we would downgrade our pick by 14 spots. I really think we could get something more than pick 19 for pick 5.
 
Finlayson is the one I've been told....and if it is him he's not as left-field as you may think. I'd call it a pretty astute choice actually.
Finlayson was one I looked over and was surprised to see how much he's improved this year, but ruled him out because we were already angling for Corr. Not that I'm discounting your info, just that they're pretty similar players last I checked.

Not sure how I feel about #5 for those names. I mean they're collectively worth more than it, but what's to stop us from giving this and next year's second round picks? Would be stoked if we can swing it so that at least #7 comes back the other way.

This also means Tuohy is going, because we've just brought in two HBFs (albeit one can play forward).

Also, Flynn's not going to give much of a shake of it at AFL level as a centre bounce ruck, and I'm not sure the rest of his game is that impressive. NEAFL form is heavily discounted, and rightfully so.

My understanding is if Crows have offered him a contract and he declines to accept - then he must be traded or go into the draft.

He can only be a DFA if club has not offered him a contract.

Not sure how he can bypass the draft and go PSD - maybe someone else can clarify that.
Essentially they can go into the PSD if their club refuses to delist them voluntarily, and that comes after 3 DFA periods.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I can understand you being frustrated and I'm not keen on losing #5 for who I had Brodie/Taranto at, but we do have to wait to put things on the scales at the end of the trade period/draft and not before the doors have even opened up.

Last year looked tragic on face value, in losing Henderson, Yarran, Bell & Menzel.....but how did that work out?
No point being pissed for another couple of weeks yet........Just sit back and relax. :)

Well not to me it didn't. I was glad we offloaded those pea hearts in Hendo, Yarran and Menzel and it actually surprised what we got in return (even though I was pushing for Yarran to go for #12, #19 wasn't a bad result). Bell was a different story, surprised we got a second round pick but he had to go and no one blamed him for it, it was a great trade.

#5 would've given us a shot at Brodie/Taranto. Had we been smart, we could've tried to get another top 10 pick, even if we give up our 2017 1st. I've really leaned towards doing that because if it gets us #6 from GC then we can pick up both Brodie and Taranto. Our midfield would be boosted quite a bit with the addition of those two alongside Cripps, that's 3 young gun mids. Exactly what we need all maturing together with Cripps leading the way.

But those plans can go up in flames now mate. Waiting to see what it's for isn't going to help. Unless it's for one of the guys I mentioned which we all know it won't be.
 
My understanding is if Crows have offered him a contract and he declines to accept - then he must be traded or go into the draft.

He can only be a DFA if club has not offered him a contract.

Not sure how he can bypass the draft and go PSD - maybe someone else can clarify that.
I believe that's incorrect, the premise is that any uncontracted player can nominate for the PSD as it's a lotto and they aren't necessarily guaranteed to get what they want
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top