WTF are you on?You obviously not liking 3 pages of referenced content to experts lol
Nah. I can post more when its referenced. Not even close.
You mean liek the person deriving revenue out of my images on a blog with advertising filling their bank account?
While it may sell a few books for Debi, I derive no commercial revenue from the references.
Which means you have some sort of commercial interest in copyright which is why you are not liking the media publish suppression order.
Bunnie, would you like to declare you have a commercial interest in this case? Just say yes or no. Keep it boolean.
No commercial interest. No familial or social connections. I have a professional interest.
And it drives me insane when I see quasi-professional 'research' quoted as fact.
As it does when decades old research is quoted as current.
And when totally out there theories are piggybacked upon each other to try to support the other as fact.
And, like everyone else, I want to know the facts, not the urban myths.
Edited to add: i gave you a heads up about the breach of copyright laws because you will get this thread closed again if you continue posting whole chunks of copy/paste text. Read the posting T&Cs.
Last edited: