dlanod
Moderator
- Sep 14, 2006
- 52,399
- 81,190
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- GWS; CCMariners; NQCowboys; Ravens
- Moderator
- #2,726
It' and just picks going home, just coz a victorian leaves brisbane for victorian don't mean he's going home. Players leave clubs.There is a sort of usual attrition, calculate the cuber and then see whats leaving brisbane above and beyond that.
Then why are they disproportionately going to their home states? Using an updated Brisbane example, 11 went home. Two went to other states.
Missed Scully , though they had the magic sprinkle of Paul Roos, who lets them regenerate hope on not much with results. Watts was there for taking but people didnt want him. other's a few who left after a while 1st round picks no longer there actually quite few depending how you vie things.
I didn't miss Scully. We're discussing players going to their home state, not every single one of those changing clubs. He was Victorian, not from NSW.
Betts?
Not a first round pick.
Kruiser and Gibbs could have gone recently and there have are few moved on.
So we're even counting players that don't leave now? Seriously?
A bit of of richmond 1st round recruiting was just poor, Tambling, Jarrod Oaklieh-Nichols just there would not have been takers.
And...? BTW Tambling was traded. He didn't go to his home state either.
See, this is why discussing with you is pointless. We were discussing your and DanA's objections to the stats on first round picks leaving to their home state. Now your counter-examples involve non-first rounders, any player moving clubs, and even those that don't move clubs or are too rubbish to count. To think you were complaining about the problems with the previous statistics. You'd rather keep trying to move the goalposts instead of actually having a consistent discussion. You still haven't provided any examples for your previous claims either.